Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.34 seconds)

Ranveer Singh Mahle S/O Prithvi Singh ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ... on 24 May, 2006

50. Although as discussed above, the case of Shahjade (Supra) was decided on the facts and circumstances of the aforesaid case and therefore is clearly distinguishable, however, any other view would render the aforesaid judgment per incuriam inasmuch as the statutory rule and regulations, amendment in the Act as well as the exposition of law in catena of cases, referred to above has not been noticed by this Court and it cannot thus be said to be a binding precedent.
Allahabad High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Shahjade (Juvenile) vs State Of U.P. And Another on 19 March, 2021

This criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist-applicant with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 18.2.2020 passed by 7th Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, POCSO Act, Jaunpur in Criminal Appeal No. 04 of 2020 (Shahjade Vs. State of U.P.), by which appeal of the revisionist-applicant was dismissed affirming the order dated 30.1.2020 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Jaunpur in Case Crime No. 646 of 2019, under Sections 376-D, 506 IPC and 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Kotwali, District- Jaunpur.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R Gupta - Full Document
1