Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing M/S. Democratic Builders vs Union Of India on 2 April, 1992

K.Karupannasamy vs N.Venkatachalam on 6 August, 2009

17.Further, another decision in M/s.Democratic Builders V. Union of India AIR 1993 Delhi 132 is relied on the side of the respondent to the effect that 'no sufficient and cogent reasons have been given and that the delay of certain period has not been explained and as such, the delay is not liable to be condoned and that the applicant must explain each and every days delay.'
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - M Venugopal - Full Document

Jai Pal vs The State (Nct Delhi) on 18 February, 2012

Even our own High Court held in a case titled as Democratic Builders Vs. Union of India AIR 1993 Delhi 132 that when no cogent CA No. 29/11 4/5 and sufficient reasons have been assigned for the delay nor delay of certain period has been explained, the delay cannot be condoned. Explaining as what was sufficient cause our High Court was also of opinion that sufficient cause contemplated by Section 5 of The Limitation Act means a cause beyond the control of the party, invoking the aid of the section.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1