Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)

Ramandeep Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 27 March, 2025

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended that the said witness (Investigating Officer) is a crucial and necessary witness for the just adjudication of the case. It is submitted that the Investigating Officer had also conducted the investigation in the cross-case arising out of the FIR in question, titled as 'State versus Ramen Kumar', and his cross-examination in the present case was not conducted properly. Further, it is urged that certain medical records pertaining to the injured persons, Sukhwinder Singh and Ramandeep 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 29-03-2025 11:20:18 ::: CRM-M No.16349 of 2025 Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:042685 2 Singh, were produced after the cross-examination of the said witness, and therefore, it is imperative to put relevant questions to him for the sake of clarity.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M N Kaul - Full Document
1