(b) In 1991 Supp (2) SCC 10 (Dhanbad Colliery Karamchari Sangh v.
Union of India) in paragraph 3, the Supreme Court held as under,
"3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and having
regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that
this appeal must succeed. The Central Government instead of referring the
dispute for adjudication to the appropriate Industrial Court under Section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, it itself decided the dispute which is
not permissible under the law. We, accordingly, allow the appeal, set aside
the order of the High Court and of the Central Government and direct the
Central Government to refer the dispute for adjudication to the appropriate
Industrial Court under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. We
further direct the Central Government to make the reference within three
months."
(e) In 1991 Supp (2) SCC 10 (Dhanbad Colliery Karamchari Sangh v.
Union of India) in paragraph 3, the Supreme Court held as under,
"3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and having
regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that
this appeal must succeed. The Central Government instead of referring the
dispute for adjudication to the appropriate Industrial Court under Section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, it itself decided the dispute which is
not permissible under the law. We, accordingly, allow the appeal, set aside
the order of the High Court and of the Central Government and direct the
Central Government to refer the dispute for adjudication to the appropriate
Industrial Court under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. We
further direct the Central Government to make the reference within three
months."