In paragraph - 9 of Kailashbai (supra), the Division Bench has
clarified that if the effect of detention is forfeiture of the property, this Court
can go into the legality, propriety and validity of the order of detention to see
whether the order was legal or proper. Therefore this judgment is of no help
to the petitioner. In the present case, there is no such consequential effect or
the order of attachment of properties after expiry of period of detention.
Therefore, facts of the present case are altogether different.