Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.33 seconds)

Shri Sadhumargi Shantkranti Jain ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax( ... on 22 January, 2024

v) DIT(E) vs. International Society for Krishna Consciousness- 2011(1) TMI-1394 (Karnataka HC) From the material on record, it is clear that the assessee is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act. From the objects of the said society, it is clear that they are carrying on religious and charitable activities. They have been granted registration under s. 12AA and consequently under s. 80G of the Act being satisfied that they are entitled to such exemption. It is only for the first time for the year 2009 the CIT for the first time called upon them to show cause why the registration should not be renewed (sic'refused) as it is a society which is only carrying on religious activities. A detailed reply setting out their stand is filed, and it is on record. In para 2 of the said statement of objections, the assessee has categorically stated that the expenditure incurred for religious activity is less than 5 per cent of the total income and therefore entitled to benefit of s. 80G. Unfortunately, the CIT has not adverted to the statement of objection except to the first para where the assessee has asserted that they have established a temple and are carrying on religious activities. Secondly the CIT has not taken note of the amendment to s. 80G wherein notwithstanding anything contained in the aforesaid provision, if the expenditure incurred towards religious activities is less than 5 per cent of the total income, the benefit under s. 80G is available to such a trust. Ignoring the aforesaid change in law, ignoring the assertion of the assessee in the statement of objections claiming exemption because of the amended law, the CIT proceeded to pass an order refusing registration. Therefore, such a finding recorded by the CIT is without any substance. The Tribunal which on facts took note of the aforesaid income and expenditure account and the relevant Schedules, came to the conclusion that the expenditure incurred by the assessee towards religious activities for two years is less than 5 per cent. The balance sheet or income and expenditure account of the Schedules is not in dispute. It is under those circumstances the appellate authority has applied its mind, looked into aforesaid undisputed records and has recorded a finding of fact.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Raipur Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

D.C.I.T. Amravati Circle, Amravati vs M/S Busyland Construction Pvt. Ltd.,, ... on 15 June, 2018

5. We have heard the rival submissions and also perused the material on record including cases relied upon by the authorities below. The Ld. CIT (A) has decided the issue in favour of the assessee by relying on the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Ambience Developers and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., 25 taxman.com 210, the judgment of Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in the CIT vs. Pratapsingh, Amrosingh Rajendra Singh and Deepak Kumar, 64 taxman 585 and the decision of the Lucknow Bench of the Tribunal rendered in the case of ITO vs. Vijeta Educational Society 118 ITD 382 in which it has been held that the valuation report of the DVO can be taken into consideration only when the books are not reliable and the AO is of the opinion that no reliance can be place on such books of account. It was further held that the provisions of section 142A cannot be read in isolation to section 145.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Nagpur Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1