M/S S.M. Dyechem Ltd vs M/S Cadbury (India) Ltd on 9 May, 2000
[See the cases quoted in N.S.Thread & Co. vs.
Chadwick & Bros. (AIR 1948 Mad. 481), which was a passing
off action].
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 79 (1.38 seconds)Documents citing
The National Sewing Thread Co., Ltd., ... vs James Chadwick And Bros., Ltd., A ... on 9 December, 1947
M/S S.M. Dyechem Ltd vs M/S Cadbury (India) Ltd on 9 May, 2000
[See the cases quoted in N.S.Thread & Co. vs.
Chadwick & Bros. (AIR 1948 Mad. 481), which was a passing
off action].
Pawan Kumar Atmaram Saboo And Anr. vs Saboo Collections on 27 July, 2001
In The National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd. carrying on business in Chidambaram v. James Chadwick and Bros. Ltd. a company registered under the English Companies Act by its duly constituted Attorney, Harvy Godfrey, Bombay, AIR (35) 1948 Madras 481 while considering the aspect of passing off action, the Madras High Court observed that an action against the person concerned is maintainable if there is a reasonable probability and not mere possibility of deception which may be by sound or sight. In the case in hand, from the averments made by the appellants and the similarity of trade name being used by the respondents, prima facie, it seems that there is a reasonable probability of deception and, therefore, the ratio laid down in the aforesaid case is also not applicable to the facts of the present case.
T.V. Venugopal vs Ushodaya Enterprises And Anr. on 29 December, 2000
(See the cases quoted in N.S. Thread and Co. v. Chadwick and Bros. AIR 1948 Madras 481 which was a passing off action).
N. Ranga Rao And Sons vs Anil Garg And Ors. on 2 December, 2005
(See the cases quoted in N.S. Thread and Co. v. Chadwick and Bros. AIR 1948 Madras 481 which was a passing off action.)
Ultra Tech Cement Limited vs Alaknanda Cement Pvt.Ltd. And Another on 28 June, 2011
Emami Ltd., GA Nos. 2951 and 3976 of 2007 and CS No.204 of 2007,
Paragraph 35 of the said decision is relevant and is reproduced
hereunder:
Vimal Dairy Limited vs Gujarat Tea Depot Company on 1 March, 2021
(See the cases quoted in N.S. Thread & Co.
Vs. Chadwick & Bros. AIR 1948 Mad 481 which was a passing-off
action.)
Chowgule & Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India And Others on 12 August, 1987
Indeed, in National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd., Chidambaram v. James Chadwick and Brothers, Ltd. , Their Lordships of the Supreme Court held that Section 8 of the General Clauses Act embodies a principle of general application but added that this is so when a Statute or Act have to be considered.
Vimal Dairy Limited vs Gujarat Tea Depot Company on 1 March, 2021
(See the cases quoted in N.S. Thread & Co.
Vs. Chadwick & Bros. AIR 1948 Mad 481 which was a passing-off
action.)
Vajara Yojna Seed Farm And Ors. vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court Ii And ... on 21 November, 2002
The Apex Court in AIR 1953 SC 357, National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd., Chidambaram v. James Chadwick and Bros. Ltd., had occasion to consider Clause 44 of Letters Patent of Calcutta High Court. The Clause 44 of the Letters Patent of Calcutta High Court are similar to Clause 35 of our Letters Patent. The Apex Court in the aforesaid judgment had held that Letters Patent arc subject to legislative power of the appropriate legislature. Relevant portion of Paragraphs 12 and 13 of the aforesaid judgment are extracted below :-