Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.94 seconds)

Chikkayya Devadiga vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 June, 2023

He has also placed reliance on the judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of VEERASWAMY VS. SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER4. Referring to Section 5(3) and Section 3(1)(e), he would point out that even in absence of instrument of a granted land, a person found to be in possession of a granted land has to be presumed that such possession is in contravention of the provisions of the PTCL Act and also in contravention of condition of grant and therefore, he would contend that the person in possession of such a granted land is not entitled to seek protection.
Karnataka High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Amaravathy Cranes And Structurals ... vs The District Collector on 19 February, 2013

He further submitted that the suo motu power can be exercised by the authorities under the Inam Act even after a long lapse of time and relied upon a judgment of the Supreme Court in Government of A.P. v. Kalleti Chengaiah, reported in (1996) 9 SCC 211 and the judgment of this Court in M.Veeraswamy Vs. Special Commissioner reported in 1996 (2) LW 451 (Mad)(DB).
Madras High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document
1