Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.32 seconds)

Tata Motors Ltd. vs Ram Lal Saini & Anr. on 6 March, 2023

In holding this view, we are relying on a recent judgment of this Commission given on 01.02.2016 in RP No.2354 of 2011, PARTLY ALLOWED PAGE 12 OF 15 FA NO./424/2014 M/S TATA MOTORS LTD. VS. MR. RAM LAL SAINI & ORS. D.O.D. 06.03.2023 Tata Motors Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Ran Singh, (NC), wherein the order of the lower fora for replacing the vehicle or paying Rs.10,43,749.37 has been set aside and the order relating to award of compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- has been upheld.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1. M/S. Terex Equipment Pvt Ltd., vs 1. Mekala Srinivasa Rao on 21 September, 2022

Accordingly, we deem it fit and appropriate that the respondent/complainant must receive some compensation and we are relying upon the recent judgement of the hon'ble National Consumer Commission in R.P.2354/2011 titled Tata Motors vs. Ran Singh, wherein the order ofthe lower fora lor replacement of vehicle or praying of value of vehicle has been set aside and order of granting compensation was upheld.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1