Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing Bhushan Vora vs The Union Of India Through The Secretary on 7 August, 2023

Shivek Sharma Legal Heir And Son Of Late ... vs Union Of India (2025:Rj-Jp:36432-Db) on 9 September, 2025

In case of Sushitex Exports India Ltd. (supra), Division Bench of this Court was pleased to quash and set aside the show cause notices which remained pending for adjudication from 1997. This Court considered the fact that though the petitioner therein was called for hearing in the year 2006, no final order was passed immediately after hearing was granted to the petitioner. It is held that the respondents seem to have slipped into deep slumber thereafter. This Court while quashing and setting aside the show cause notices which were not decided after long delay was pleased to grant consequential relief to the petitioner therein by directing the respondents to return the amounts paid by the petitioner under protest during the course of investigation with interest @ 12% p.a."
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary, ... on 14 October, 2024

8. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.389 of 2023 decided on 10 September 2024 in the case of Bhusan Vora Vs. The Union of India & Ors., to which one of us (Jitendra Jain, J.) was a party, had to consider this issue. After considering paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 of the said decision, we believe that in the absence of the assessee being informed about his case being
Bombay High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Paresh H. Mehta vs Union Of India And Ors on 24 October, 2024

17. In this case, the transfer of the matter to the call book was delayed. The show cause notice was issued in 2008, and the alleged transfer to the call book was in 2021. No intimation was given to the Petitioner; therefore, provisions of Section 28(9) of the Customs Act were breached. This Court has even otherwise taken the view that even without referring to the requirements of Section 28(9) of the Customs Act, the Respondents were duty-bound to intimate the party about transferring the matter to the call book. Such propositions are laid in The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd Vs Union of India & Ors6, in Coventry Estates Pvt Ltd (supra) and Bhushan Vohra (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document
1