Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)
Documents citing Mr. Gankidi Venkata Krishna Reddy vs Gankidi Venkata Ranga Reddy And Ors. on 27 February, 2004

Santosh Kumar Sony And Others vs 1.Chairman, A.P.State Co-Operative ... on 23 July, 2013

In G.Venkata Reddy (1 supra), a learned Single Judge of this Court while considering the provisions of Order XXI Rule 85 and 90 of CPC, held that failure to deposit stamp duty amount within 15 days from sale of property did not constitute an irregularity in the conduct of a sale as the deposit of stamp duty is subsequent to conduct of sale. Therefore this finding of the Tribunal also cannot be sustained.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 22 - Cited by 1 - M S Rao - Full Document

K.Vijay Anand, S/O.K.V.Anand vs Smt.Y.Suvarna, W/O.Y.Mallesh And ... on 17 July, 2013

Basing upon this judgment, a learned single Judge of this court in G.Venkata Reddy's case referred to supra held that the local amendment to Rule 85 requiring deposit of stamp duty charges along with full purchase money stood impliedly repealed and non-deposit of the same in time cannot constitute a material irregularity which vitiates the sale. The aforesaid two decisions do support the contention of Smt.Manjari.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - N R Shankar - Full Document
1