Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (1.24 seconds)
Documents citing Bholanath Choudhary vs The State Of Jharkhand on 11 December, 2018

Deepak Shrivas vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

8. It is submitted that the ratio of the said judgment squarely applies to the present case, where the petitioners have been continued 31 for decades and then subjected to outsourcing without any justification. On the issue of abrupt termination and its effect, the learned counsel submits that similarly situated employee, namely Naresh Kumar Yadav, who was terminated, was granted relief by the High Court and subsequently regularized by the department.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gorelal vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

8. It is submitted that the ratio of the said judgment squarely applies to the present case, where the petitioners have been continued 31 for decades and then subjected to outsourcing without any justification. On the issue of abrupt termination and its effect, the learned counsel submits that similarly situated employee, namely Naresh Kumar Yadav, who was terminated, was granted relief by the High Court and subsequently regularized by the department.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ravi Shripal vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

8. It is submitted that the ratio of the said judgment squarely applies to the present case, where the petitioners have been continued 31 for decades and then subjected to outsourcing without any justification. On the issue of abrupt termination and its effect, the learned counsel submits that similarly situated employee, namely Naresh Kumar Yadav, who was terminated, was granted relief by the High Court and subsequently regularized by the department.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mannu Das vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

8. It is submitted that the ratio of the said judgment squarely applies to the present case, where the petitioners have been continued 31 for decades and then subjected to outsourcing without any justification. On the issue of abrupt termination and its effect, the learned counsel submits that similarly situated employee, namely Naresh Kumar Yadav, who was terminated, was granted relief by the High Court and subsequently regularized by the department.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Khilawan Singh vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

8. It is submitted that the ratio of the said judgment squarely applies to the present case, where the petitioners have been continued 31 for decades and then subjected to outsourcing without any justification. On the issue of abrupt termination and its effect, the learned counsel submits that similarly situated employee, namely Naresh Kumar Yadav, who was terminated, was granted relief by the High Court and subsequently regularized by the department.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manoj Kumar Soni vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

8. It is submitted that the ratio of the said judgment squarely applies to the present case, where the petitioners have been continued 31 for decades and then subjected to outsourcing without any justification. On the issue of abrupt termination and its effect, the learned counsel submits that similarly situated employee, namely Naresh Kumar Yadav, who was terminated, was granted relief by the High Court and subsequently regularized by the department.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Swaraj Kumar Shrivastava vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

8. It is submitted that the ratio of the said judgment squarely applies to the present case, where the petitioners have been continued 31 for decades and then subjected to outsourcing without any justification. On the issue of abrupt termination and its effect, the learned counsel submits that similarly situated employee, namely Naresh Kumar Yadav, who was terminated, was granted relief by the High Court and subsequently regularized by the department.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanyasi Rao vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

8. It is submitted that the ratio of the said judgment squarely applies to the present case, where the petitioners have been continued 31 for decades and then subjected to outsourcing without any justification. On the issue of abrupt termination and its effect, the learned counsel submits that similarly situated employee, namely Naresh Kumar Yadav, who was terminated, was granted relief by the High Court and subsequently regularized by the department.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rashtra Pal Vandre vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

8. It is submitted that the ratio of the said judgment squarely applies to the present case, where the petitioners have been continued 31 for decades and then subjected to outsourcing without any justification. On the issue of abrupt termination and its effect, the learned counsel submits that similarly situated employee, namely Naresh Kumar Yadav, who was terminated, was granted relief by the High Court and subsequently regularized by the department.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shankar Lal Sahu vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

8. It is submitted that the ratio of the said judgment squarely applies to the present case, where the petitioners have been continued 31 for decades and then subjected to outsourcing without any justification. On the issue of abrupt termination and its effect, the learned counsel submits that similarly situated employee, namely Naresh Kumar Yadav, who was terminated, was granted relief by the High Court and subsequently regularized by the department.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next