Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.79 seconds)Mohan Lal Gupta vs D.A.V. College Managing Committee ... on 23 January, 2004
It was contended that there is no bar to the maintainability of the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, if the order passed by the respondent was patently illegal and void and in this regard has placed reliance on Sahdeo Singh Solanki Vs. Government of NCT of Delhi . Ms. Mittal has also contended that Rule 98 of Delhi School Education Rules applies to both aided as well as unaided schools. It was contended that whole of Chapter VIII of Rules applies to the private school whether aided or unaided other than unaided minority school. It was contended that where a provision is meant specifically for aided school the same has been clarified in the provision itself.
Kuna Ramanayya vs Andhra Education Society (Regd.) & Anr. on 4 July, 2011
c) Dr. Sahdeo Singh Solanki v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
65(1997) DLT 390 (DB);
Marrapu Venugopala Rao vs Andhra Education Society (Regd.) & Anr. on 4 July, 2011
c) Dr. Sahdeo Singh Solanki v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
65(1997) DLT 390 (DB);
Sri Yenni Srinivasa Rao vs Andhra Education Society (Regd.) & Anr. on 4 July, 2011
c) Dr. Sahdeo Singh Solanki v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
65(1997) DLT 390 (DB);
Ms. Marpu Shekina Priya vs Andhra Education Society (Regd.) & Anr. on 4 July, 2011
c) Dr. Sahdeo Singh Solanki v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
65(1997) DLT 390 (DB);
P. Urmila Devi vs Director (Education), Govt. Of Nct Of ... on 4 July, 2011
c) Dr. Sahdeo Singh Solanki v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
65(1997) DLT 390 (DB);
Rajeev Khurana vs Principal, Saraswati Bal Mandir And Ors on 21 February, 2025
22. Next, he submitted that SSS had in fact sought approval of the
DOE by a letter dated 22.04.1998 but had not received any response
from the DoE. He submitted that in the aforesaid circumstances, it
must be inferred that the DOE had approved the termination of the
appellant's services. He also referred the decision of the Division
Bench of this court in Sahdeo Singh Solanki v. Government of NCT
of Delhi6 and submitted that in the said case the contention that prior
approval is deemed to have been granted was rejected for the reasons
that the letter seeking the approval of the DOE was sent on the same
date on which the services of the employee were terminated. However,
the observations made by the court indicated that there would be a
6 1996 SCC OnLine Del 764
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:TARUN RANA LPA No.780/2013 Page 8 of 31
Signing Date:21.02.2025
16:26:53
deemed approval, if a reasonable time was granted to the DOE for
satisfying itself as to the said request.
1