Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (1.01 seconds)

Ravatsinh Ranubha vs V.S. Sinha Or His Successor And Ors. on 19 September, 2000

Regarding execution of the decree qua the agricultural land subject to the land revenue the Bombay High Court in Timmanna Parmeshwar Bhat Vs. Govind Ganpati Bhat and others - AIR 1926 Bombay 258 has laid down that once the Collector executes the partition, the Court cannot send the case again to the Collector for repartition. It is also held that the Collector must follow the terms of the decree. If he disregards the terms of the decree and divides the property not in conformity with the terms of the decree, the Court is entitled to interfere. The Collector has no power to read the decree together with the judgment so that he can partition the land in a manner which is not contemplated by the decree.
Gujarat High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1