Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 154 (2.17 seconds)
Documents citing Neeraj Kumar Sharma And Anr. vs State Of M.P. And Ors. on 12 April, 2007

Neeraj Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 May, 2020

8. The applicant shall enroll himself with the District Magistrate, Vidisha as "COVID-19 Warrior" by entering his name in a Register named as COVID-19 WARRIOR REGISTER. The applicant then, shall be assigned work of COVID-19 disaster management at the discretion of District Magistrate Vidisha by taking all prescribed precautions. The nature, quantum and duration of the work assigned is left to the the wisdom of District Magistrate, Vidisha. This Court expects that the applicant shall rise to the occasion to serve the society in such crisis by discharging his fundamental duty of rendering THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-14346-2020 (NEERAJ SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) national service when called upon to do so as per Article 51- A(d) of the constitution.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R K Shrivastava - Full Document

Neeraj Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 August, 2018

3. Undisputed facts are that the petitioner participated in the recruitment process for appointment to the post of Constable in Police Force under the State of M.P. conducted in 2013. Despite selection, no appointment order was issued to the petitioner which impelled him to prefer W.P. No. 6823/2014 vide P-4. During pendency of the said petition, order Annexure P-4 dated 21.10.2014 was issued informing the petitioner that he was declared ineligible for appointment to the police force on the ground of the adverse character verification report submitted by the S.P. Monger Bihar, which impelled the petitioner to 2 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH W.P. No.21647/2017 (Neeraj Sharma Vs. State of M.P.) withdraw the said petition and filing a fresh one bearing W.P. No. 33/2015 which was disposed of vide order dated 21.10.2014 directing the respondents to reconsider the case of the petitioner, which was followed by filing of Contempt Petition No. 248/2017, during the pendency of which the impugned order P-1 was passed, rendering the said contempt petition infructuous thereby compelling the petitioner to prefer the present writ petition.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neeraj Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 February, 2019

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on 07.02.2019, complainant-Sushil Kumar Sharma, Branch Manager, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Vidisha submitted a written report at Police Station Nateran District Vidisha alleging therein that present applicant Neeraj Sharma, Sahayak Samiti Pravandhak, Prathmik Krishi Sakh Sahakari Samiti Pamariya Branch Nateran had dishonestly and fraudulently prepared forged documents and on these forged documents, he had caused loss Rs.25,08,410.29 to the Bank. On this, one inquiry was made against him and found the guilt. On 07.10.2017, 2 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.7905/2019 (Neeraj Sharma Vs State of Madhya Pradesh) he had deposited Rs.7,00,000/- but afterwards he again tried to make a loss to the Bank on the names of members Shri Lakhan Singh & Shri Kamal Singh. On the basis of this written application, the present case has been registered against the applicant. It is further submitted that after two years, F.I.R. was lodged against the applicant. The allegation of cheating and forgery is made against the applicant. Factum of cheating and forgery is yet to be established. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He is sole earning member of his family. There are no criminal antecedents. There is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from justice and he is ready to cooperate in the investigation. On these grounds, he prays for anticipatory bail to the applicant.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neeraj Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 May, 2020

(Anand Pathak) Judge RASHID Digitally signed by RASHID KHAN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT Of M P BENCH GWALIOR, postalCode=474011, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=23377d7d214c811801fc322b576ca4ed1 KHAN 954237f6324416af3985b5e9940ed42, serialNumber=111cc474a72b078dc9a89f3cb13bb 668fd8e0e91beda3cb721bbd836d768b09c, cn=RASHID KHAN Date: 2020.05.19 17:18:49 +05'30' 3 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No.11069/2020 (Neeraj Sharma Vs. State of M.P.) Rashid
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document

Neeraj Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 September, 2020

It is true that due to Covid-19 Pandemic situation, evidence is not being taken up since many months hence, it would be 2 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE M.Cr.C. No.29477 of 2020 (Neeraj Sharma vs. State of MP) appropriate to grant bail to the applicant. Without commenting upon the merits of the case, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that applicant - Neeraj Sharma shall be released on bail temporarily for a period of 60 (Sixty) days subject to his furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court and an undertaking that he will surrender before the concerned Court immediately after expiry of 60th day from the date of his release. Learned Trial Court shall examine parents of the deceased only after surrender of the applicant.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Shukla - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next