Shri Surendra K M vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 April, 2024
33. Though petitioner has contended that he has been
in occupation of schedule property even as on date of initiation
of acquisition proceedings and therefore entitled for notice,
High Court of Madras after referring to several earlier decisions
held in Palani Gunrukkal v. Commissioner and Secretary
to the Government, reported in 1995 SCC OnLine Mad 74
as follows: