Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.88 seconds)

Haripriya Rayaningar vs The Secretary To Government on 11 November, 2010

In Natwarbhai Magainbhai Patel v. Collector and Ors., reported in 1996 (5) SCC 498, the contention of the land owner was that the land was not immediately put to use, for which, acquisition was done. The Supreme Court held that, "In what manner the lands require to be utilised has been regulated under the provisions of the act. It is not a condition, under the Act, that payment of compensation be made before utilisation of the land of which the petitioner was erswhile owner. Under these circumstances, we do not find any illegality in the order passed by the High Court in Special Civil Appeal No.4093/93 on May 15, 1995. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed."
Madras High Court Cites 124 - Cited by 0 - S Manikumar - Full Document

Madhav Developers - A Partnership Firm vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 4 August, 2014

2. Learned   senior   counsel   for   the   petitioners  relied   on   the   decisions   in   case   of  Nathubhai   Dulabhai   Patel   vs.   Collector   in   Special   Civil   Application   No.5057   of   1998  and   in   case   of  Collector vs. Nathubhai Dulabhai Patel in Letters   Patent Appeal No.392 of 1999.
Gujarat High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - K M Thaker - Full Document
1