Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.37 seconds)

Shanker Lal Son Of Late Sri Jawahar Lal, ... vs Punjab And Sind Bank, Government Of ... on 14 December, 2007

In AIR 1993 Supreme Court 2462 Kailash Chandra Rajawat v. Union of India and Anr., the Apex Court has held that eligibility, completion of prescribed period of service, period of temporary service on pre-promotional post has to be considered. The Apex Court has further observed in para 5 that "the period spent by the appellant, as temporary duty prior to his regularisation was required to be taken into consideration for considering his eligibility for promotion and when so taken, it is apparent that appellant possessed the requisite experience as a trains clerk for his eligibility to promotion as Goods Guard-C."
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - S Kumar - Full Document

Kalipada Das vs M/O Railways on 20 October, 2023

4. Mr. NLR .Routray, learned counsel appearing for the peliSoner contended that the TNbunal, vide order dated 20.03.2018 in OLA. No.260/00321 of 2014 (Girish Chandra Rabat vs. Union of India and others) allowed the benefit of ACP. Against the said order, the Union of india had approached this Court by Aling WP no.l3677 of 2018 and this Court after due adjudication, vide order dated 20.07 2022, dismissed the said writ petition, relying upon the order passed by the Apex Court in SLP(C) no. 11040 of £013. Therefore, the rejection of the claim of the petitioner by the Tribunal on the ground of delay and laches cannat he sustained In the eye of law. It is further contended that there is continuity of cause of action for the petitioner to claim the benefit of ACP, S. Mr. |. Nayak, learned Central Gavernment Counsel appearing for the Union of India-opposite parties admits the fact that this Court dismissed WIR{E) No.13677 of 2018 Nled by the Union of India relying upon the order passed hy the Apex Court in SLP{C} No. 11040 of 2013.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1