Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 42 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Divya Verma And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 17 August, 2023

Soni Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 10 January, 2025

(iv) We find that the Delhi High Court has taken this view, i.e., that Section 174A,, IPC is a stand stand-alone offence in Mukesh Bhatia v.State (NCT of Delhi) 2022 SCC OnLine Del 1023; Divya Verma v. State 2023 SCC OnLine Del 2619 2619; Sameena & Anr. v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr. Crl. M.C. No.1470 of 2021, Dated 17th May, 2022 For the reasons afore afore-stated, stated, we agree with the findings made in these judgments/orders. At the same time, it stands clarified that we have not commented on the merits of the cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak Nagpal vs State Of Haryana on 20 March, 2025

(iv) We find that the Delhi High Court has taken this view, i.e., that Section 174A, IPC is a stand-alone offence in Mukesh Bhatia v. State (NCT of Delhi)19; Divya Verma v. State20; Sameena & Anr. v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.21 For the reasons afore- stated, we agree with the findings made in these judgments/orders. At the same time, it stands clarified that we have not commented on the merits of the cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sumanpreet Singh vs State Of Punjab on 14 October, 2025

(iv) We find that the Delhi High Court has taken this view, i.e., that Section 174A, IPC is a stand-alone offence in Mukesh Bhatia v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2022 SCC Online Del 1023; Divya Verma v. State, 2023 SCC Online Del 2619; Sameena & Anr. v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr., Crl. M.C No, 1470 of 2021, Dated 17th May, 2022 For the reasons afore-stated, we agree with the findings made in these judgments/orders. At the same time, it stands clarified that we have not commented on the merits of the cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sumanpreet Singh Alias Honey vs State Of Punjab on 14 October, 2025

(iv) We find that the Delhi High Court has taken this view, i.e., that Section 174A, IPC is a stand-alone offence in Mukesh Bhatia v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2022 SCC Online Del 1023; Divya Verma v. State, 2023 SCC Online Del 2619; Sameena & Anr. v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr., Crl. M.C No, 1470 of 2021, Dated 17th May, 2022 For the reasons afore-stated, we agree with the findings made in these judgments/orders. At the same time, it stands clarified that we have not commented on the merits of the cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Krishan Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 13 November, 2025

(iv) We find that the Delhi High Court has taken this view, i.e., that Section 174A, IPC is a stand-alone offence in Mukesh Bhatia v.State (NCT of Delhi) 2022 SCC OnLine Del 1023; Divya Verma v. State 2023 SCC OnLine Del 2619; Sameena & Anr. v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr. Crl. M.C. No.1470 of 2021, Dated 17th May, 2022 For the reasons afore-stated, we agree with the findings made in these judgments/orders. At the same time, it stands clarified that we have not commented on the merits of the cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pardeep Kaur And Another vs State Of Punjab on 20 November, 2025

(iv) We find that the Delhi High Court has taken this view, i.e., that Section 174A, IPC is a stand-alone offence in Mukesh Bhatia v.State (NCT of Delhi) 2022 SCC OnLine Del 1023; Divya Verma v. State 2023 SCC OnLine Del 2619; Sameena & Anr. v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr. Crl. M.C. No.1470 of 2021, Dated 17th May, 2022 For the reasons afore-stated, we agree with the findings made in these judgments/orders. At the same time, it stands clarified that we have not commented on the merits of the cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunita Wajir And Another vs State Of Haryana And Another on 20 November, 2025

(iv) We find that the Delhi High Court has taken this view, i.e., that Section 174A, IPC is a stand-alone offence in Mukesh Bhatia v. State (NCT of Delhi)19; Divya Verma v. State20; Sameena & Anr. v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.21 For the reasons afore- stated, we agree with the findings made in these judgments/orders. At the same time, it stands clarified that we have not commented on the merits of the cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next