Reyaz Ahmad Khan And Ors vs Ut Of J&K And Ors on 15 July, 2025
7. Counsel for petitioners would contend that dispute between the parties,
that resulted in lodgement of FIR as well, has been resolved by them by
amicable settlement as is evident from their statements recorded by
Registrar Judicial of this Court and, as such, impugned FIR may be
quashed because if FIR is not quashed it will cause great oppression
and prejudice to petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners in support of
their contentions have placed reliance on the judgements passed in
Sardar Ali Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal
Secretary Home Department and Anr., AIR 2020 SC 626; judgement
dated 16th January 2019 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at
Nainital in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.112/2019 titled as Akil Ahmad
vs. State of Uttarakhand and others; judgement dated 9th February
2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur
in S.B.CriminalMisc (Pet.)