Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.27 seconds)

Shyamal Mallick vs Mamta Das on 17 March, 2026

The said provision also came up for consideration before Kerala High Court in Lakshmi v. Padmanabhan Nadar, 1967 Ker LT 490. It was held that under the law the minor must be informed of the pendency of the suit and in absence of such a notice the minor cannot be imputed with the knowledge of the pendency of the suit. So, before any adverse order is to be made against the minor who has attained majority, the court is liable to give notice which in the present case is not necessary because appellant No. 5 has now come forward to give her consent for continuing the appeal on her behalf as well.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1