Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.30 seconds)

Ramrao Laxman Bansode vs The Collector Nanded And Others on 17 October, 2025

In this backdrop, the counsel for petitioner relies upon the judgment in the matter of Sunil Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others (W.P. No. 3419 of 2013), wherein, in an identical situation, this Court has held that to enable the Sarpanch to raise proper defence and explain sufficient cause for his failure to perform any statutory function, he must be informed essentially as regards his failure meaning thereby, he must be communicated the specific charges. This court was therefore pleased to quash and set aside the disqualification of the Sarpanch therein.
Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Baburao Nangare And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 9 December, 2021

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance on the unreported judgment of this Court delivered on 27 th November, 2020 in case of Nita A.Patil & Ors. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. in Writ Petition No. 9247 of 2019 and would submit that after adverting to the judgment of the Aurangabad Bench in case of Ganpat Vitthal Dapute & Ors. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. in Writ Petition No.14797 of 2017 this Court on 11th June, 2019 has held that the Government Resolution dated 24th August, 2017 will have prospective effect. Learned counsel for the respondents could not distinguish the said judgment delivered on 27th November, 2020 in Writ Petition No. 9247 of 2019. In our view the said judgment would squarely apply to the facts of this case.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R N Laddha - Full Document
1