Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.31 seconds)

Sri Aswathappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 April, 2022

24. The Hon'ble Division Bench, in the case of B.S.Kallappa and K.C.Yogesh (supra) has already held that Sections 4 and 11 impart overriding effect to the PTCL Act over all other enactments. Section 11 clearly provides that the provisions of the Act shall have effect 'notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force' or any custom, usage or contract or any decree or order of a court, tribunal or other authority. That being so, it is clear that the Land Tribunal had no authority to confer occupancy rights in favour of the respondents in respect of lands granted to the petitioners who belong to the Scheduled Caste community. Challenge raised to -33- such orders of the Land Tribunal have been upheld by this Court and such orders have been quashed and set aside.
Karnataka High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - R Devdas - Full Document
1