Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.48 seconds)
Documents citing Geeta Anand vs Tanya Arjun & Anr on 27 September, 2022

Sunita Ahuja & Anr vs Divya Arora Ahuja on 15 September, 2023

5. Counsel contends that in fact, by reason of the conflicting views taken by the learned single Judge in Avneet Kaur (supra), the question of whether a suit for possession filed by the parents-in-law against a daughter in-law is to be tried exclusively by the Family Court has been referred to a larger Bench by another learned single Judge of this court vide judgment dated 01.06.2023 in CS(OS) No. 601/2022 titled Geeta Anand vs. Tanya Arjun & Anr., and that reference is still pending.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A J Bhambani - Full Document

Court On Its Own Motion vs Unknown on 4 October, 2023

3. It has been brought to the attention of this Court that an issue identical to the one raised vide PUC reference dated 04.03.2023, reproduced at paragraph no.1, has been framed for consideration by a Coordinate Bench of this Court and placed for consideration before the Division Bench in CS(OS) No. 601/2022, which is next listed before the Division Bench on 01.11.2023. Accordingly, the outcome of the said reference will be subject to the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in CS(OS) No. 601/2022, titled as 'Geeta Anand v. Tanya Arjun & Anr.' This is a digitally signed order.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - M P Arora - Full Document

Harmeet Singh Nanda & Ors vs Mrs. Sarabjit Kaur Baba on 17 November, 2025

6. Mr. Rajesh Mahindru, learned counsel for the plaintiffs, however, submits that the defendant has misappropriated not only the property of plaintiff no. 1, her husband, but also that of the other plaintiffs. Therefore, according to him, the present dispute is not merely with respect to matrimonial property so as to confer jurisdiction to adjudicate on the Family Court. He places reliance on the decision dated 01.04.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Geeta Anand v. Tanya Arjun & Anr. 1, in support of the aforesaid submission.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Nirmal Sahni vs Sonia Sahni & Anr on 19 May, 2026

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 21:15:36 respondent No.1 that the proceedings before the learned Family Court are non est and have to be undertaken afresh is not tenable as the subject suit after being initially instituted before learned Civil Judge, South, Saket, was returned to the learned Family Court in view of judgment passed by learned Coordinate Bench of this Court in Avneet Kaur v. Sadhu Singh & Anr., 2022 SCC OnLine Del 4815, which has now been expressly overruled by the learned Division Bench of this Court in Geeta Anand (supra). In these circumstances, the petitioner cannot be asked again to pursue a fresh suit all over again before learned Civil Court.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Sharma - Full Document

Kavita vs Sanjay Jain on 20 May, 2026

6. On 23.04.2026, this Court granted status quo on account of the fact that the subject premises was their matrimonial home and that the marriage to the parties is subsisting. It is further pertinent to note that learned Division Bench of this Court in Geeta Anand v. Tanya Arjun and Anr. 2024 SCC OnLine Del 2327 held that the learned Family Court has no exclusive jurisdiction over disputes which by their very nature incidentally indicates a matrimonial relationship and where such relationship is not a foundational fact to lay such a claim and the core of the said dispute independently exist in civil law.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A Sharma - Full Document
1   2 Next