citedby: 1361651

Sampath vs The Director Of Municipal ... on 21 June, 2018

9.Learned counsel for the sixth respondent further relied upon the judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Master Marine Services (P) Ltd., Vs. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd. And another reported in (2005) 6 Supreme Court Cases 138 that were relied upon by the Delhi High Court in the earlier judgment.

Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S S Sundar - Full Document

Shri Mahadev Shahra Sukrat Trust ... vs Urban Development And Environment ... on 22 March, 2024

➢ Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd. and Anr reported in (2005) 6 SCC 138.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Vhcpl-Adcc Pingalai Infrastructure ... vs Union Of India & Ors. on 10 August, 2010

These principles were reiterated in a later judgment of the Supreme Court reported at (2005) 6 SCC 138 Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. vs. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 6 - G Mittal - Full Document

Shri Mahadev Shahra Sukrat Trust Thru. ... vs Ministry Of Urban Development And ... on 22 March, 2024

➢ Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd. and Anr reported in (2005) 6 SCC 138.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Indore Education And Services Society ... vs Ministry Of Housing And Environment on 22 March, 2024

➢ Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd. and Anr reported in (2005) 6 SCC 138.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Reserved On: 30.01.2025 vs The Directorate Of Medical Education & ... on 31 January, 2025

The Courts must realise their limitations and the havoc which needless interference in commercial matters can cause. In contracts involving technical issues, the courts should be even more reluctant because most of us in judges' robes do not have the necessary expertise to adjudicate upon technical issues beyond our domain. As laid down in the judgments [Ed. : The reference appears to be to Tata Cellular v. Union of India, (1994) 6 SCC 651; Raunaq International Ltd. v. I.V.R. Construction Ltd., (1999) 1 SCC 492; Air India Ltd. v. Cochin International Airport Ltd., (2000) 2 SCC 617; Ksidc Ltd. v. Cavalet India Ltd., (2005) 4 SCC 456; Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. v. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd., (2005) 6 SCC 138; B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd. v. Nair Coal Services Ltd., (2006) 11 SCC 548; Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa, (2007) 14 SCC 517; Michigan Rubber (India) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka, (2012) 8 SCC 216; Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Nagpur Metro Rail Corpn. Ltd., (2016) 16 SCC 818; Montecarlo Ltd. v. NTPC Ltd., (2016) 15 SCC 272; Municipal Corpn., Ujjain v. BVG India Ltd., (2018) 5 SCC 462: (2018) 3 SCC (Civ) 291; Caretel Infotech Ltd. v. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd., (2019) 14 SCC 81] cited above, the courts should not use a magnifying glass while scanning the tenders and make every small mistake appear like a big blunder. In fact, the courts must give "fair play in the joints"

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Khanna Paper Mills Ltd. Throug Jaimin M ... vs Gujarat State Board Of School Textbooks ... on 3 September, 2021

In Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. vs. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd., reported in (2005) 6 SCC 138, it was held that while exercising power of judicial review in respect of contracts, the Court should concern itself primarily with the question, whether there has been any infirmity in the decision-

Gujarat High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

M/S. Nanda Infra Construction Pvt. Ltd vs State Of Orissa on 18 November, 2024

In case of Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. v. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd., reported in (2005) 6 SCC 138, the Supreme Court has laid down in paragraph 12 as under:-

Orissa High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Khanna Paper Mills Ltd. Throug Jaimin M ... vs Gujarat State Board Of School Textbooks ... on 3 September, 2021

In Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. vs. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd., reported in (2005) 6 SCC 138, it was held that while exercising power of judicial review in respect of contracts, the Court should concern itself primarily with the question, whether there has been any infirmity in the decision-

Gujarat High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

M/S Nezone Pipes & Structures vs The State Of Manipur Through The on 16 August, 2021

33. Again in the case of Master Marine Services (P) Ltc Vs Metcalfe & Hodkinson (P) Ltd & Anr reported in (2005) 6 SCC 138 the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under:

Manipur High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - L Jamir - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results