Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 38 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing M.M. Bhatia And Co., A Proprietary ... vs Binny Limited, A Company Incorporated ... on 28 May, 2007

Ravi vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 January, 2024

The revision petitioner/accused has filed this petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Basavana Bagewadi in C.C.No.308/2010 and confirmed by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayapur in Criminal Appeal No.64/2017, for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code, (for short 'IPC'), Section 134 read with Section 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'M. V. Act') and Section 3 read with Section 182 of the M. V. Act.
Karnataka High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R Badamikar - Full Document

Rukum Patel S/O Chand Patel vs The State on 31 January, 2024

This revision petition is filed by the revision petitioner/accused under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the learned II Additional JMFC, Kalaburagi in C.C.No.324/2014 for the offences punishable under Sections 279, 304-A, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') and Section 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'M. V. Act'), which was confirmed by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in Criminal Appeal No.15/2018 vide judgment dated 14.09.2020.
Karnataka High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R Badamikar - Full Document

The Branch Manager, The New India ... vs Gangabai W/O Shivgond Kori on 23 September, 2020

5. There is no dispute about the fact that the claim petition was filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'M. V. Act'). In such a petition, the question of negligence has no relevance and the only point that is required to be proved is that the death or personal injury which gives cause of action for maintaining the claim petition has taken place on account of use of a motor vehicle. It cannot be disputed that the deceased has died on account of an accident in which the truck was involved.
Karnataka High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chavali Bai And Anr vs Mallanna And Anr on 19 January, 2022

This is claimant's appeal filed under Section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred as 'M. V. Act') challenging the impugned judgment and award, on quantum as well as fixing the liability on respondent No.1/owner of the offending vehicle. Appellant has sought for enhancement of the compensation and to fix the liability on respondent No.2/insurance company.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next