Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.54 seconds)
Documents citing Chander And Ors. vs Mauji And Ors. on 28 September, 1988

Joseph vs The Spl. Tahsildar (La) on 24 August, 2007

11. Another Full Bench of the Delhi High Court in Chander and Ors. v. Mauji and Ors. followed the decision in (supra) and held that the provisions of Chapter XXII of the Code of Civil Procedure and those of the Limitation Act relating to abatement on the death of a party would apply to the proceedings under Sections 30 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act and also to the appeal arising out of the said proceedings.
Kerala High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - K T Sankaran - Full Document

Special Land Acquisition Officer (2) vs Shri Harichandra Ramji Patil & Others on 16 September, 1999

6. Once section 53 makes applicable the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure to the extent that they are not inconsistent to the provisions of the Code, it will be difficult to contend that the provisions of Order 22 would not apply. Even if it is construed that the reference is not a suit yet the reference has to be made to a Civil Court and considering section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure will also apply in so far as the applications to a Court are concerned. A co-joint reading of section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with section 53 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and considering the views expressed by the Full Bench of the Delhi High Court which has considered various other judgments, I am in respectful agreement with the view as taken by the Full Bench of the Delhi High Court in the case of Chander & others (supra) as also in the case of Ram Piari (supra) that Order 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure as well as the provisions of the Limitation Act apply.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 1 - F I Rebello - Full Document

Joseph vs The Special Tahsildar (L.A) on 24 August, 2007

11. Another Full Bench of the Delhi High Court in Chander and others v. Mauji and others (AIR 1989 DELHI 97) followed the decision in AIR 1978 DELHI 129(supra) and held that the provisions of Order XXII of the Code of Civil Procedure and those of the Limitation Act relating to abatement on the death of a party would apply to the proceedings under Sections 30 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act and also to the appeal arising out of the said proceedings.
Kerala High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 11 - K T Sankaran - Full Document

Shivkumar Pandurang Dharmadhikari vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ... on 5 December, 2025

10. There is no difference in the adjudication by the Court 6 fa 1938.24 under Section 18 and under Section 30 of the Act. The title to the compensation is determined in both the proceedings. My attention is adverted to Full Bench decision of Delhi High Court rendered in the case of Chander and Others vs. Mauji and other reported in AIR 1989 DELHI 97, which was not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge in Dr. Abhay Laddulal Shah Vs. Udaykumar Radhakisan Dubey (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anandidas Raghuttam Dharmadhikari vs The State Of Maharashtra,Through ... on 5 December, 2025

10. There is no difference in the adjudication by the Court 6 fa 1938.24 under Section 18 and under Section 30 of the Act. The title to the compensation is determined in both the proceedings. My attention is adverted to Full Bench decision of Delhi High Court rendered in the case of Chander and Others vs. Mauji and other reported in AIR 1989 DELHI 97, which was not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge in Dr. Abhay Laddulal Shah Vs. Udaykumar Radhakisan Dubey (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivkumar Pandurang Dharmadhikari vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ... on 5 December, 2025

10. There is no difference in the adjudication by the Court 6 fa 1938.24 under Section 18 and under Section 30 of the Act. The title to the compensation is determined in both the proceedings. My attention is adverted to Full Bench decision of Delhi High Court rendered in the case of Chander and Others vs. Mauji and other reported in AIR 1989 DELHI 97, which was not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge in Dr. Abhay Laddulal Shah Vs. Udaykumar Radhakisan Dubey (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Keshavji Parmar And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ... on 5 December, 2025

10. There is no difference in the adjudication by the Court 6 fa 1938.24 under Section 18 and under Section 30 of the Act. The title to the compensation is determined in both the proceedings. My attention is adverted to Full Bench decision of Delhi High Court rendered in the case of Chander and Others vs. Mauji and other reported in AIR 1989 DELHI 97, which was not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge in Dr. Abhay Laddulal Shah Vs. Udaykumar Radhakisan Dubey (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anandidas Raghuttam Dharmadhikari vs The State Of Maharashtra,Through ... on 5 December, 2025

10. There is no difference in the adjudication by the Court 6 fa 1938.24 under Section 18 and under Section 30 of the Act. The title to the compensation is determined in both the proceedings. My attention is adverted to Full Bench decision of Delhi High Court rendered in the case of Chander and Others vs. Mauji and other reported in AIR 1989 DELHI 97, which was not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge in Dr. Abhay Laddulal Shah Vs. Udaykumar Radhakisan Dubey (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Keshavji Parmar And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ... on 5 December, 2025

10. There is no difference in the adjudication by the Court 6 fa 1938.24 under Section 18 and under Section 30 of the Act. The title to the compensation is determined in both the proceedings. My attention is adverted to Full Bench decision of Delhi High Court rendered in the case of Chander and Others vs. Mauji and other reported in AIR 1989 DELHI 97, which was not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge in Dr. Abhay Laddulal Shah Vs. Udaykumar Radhakisan Dubey (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1