Sawan @ Vishal Jaiswal And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 26 August, 2022
13. On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State have submitted that the impugned judgement of revisional court suffers from no infirmity because learned revisional court by impugned judgement set-aside the order dated 07.01.2021 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.17, Allahabad and directed to pass cognizance order in view of the observations made by this Court vide order dated 23.01.2019 passed in Criminal Revision No. 3160 of 2018 (Saritendra Kumar Jaiswal vs. State of U.P. and 5 Others), wherein this Court has observed that "since the court concerned, to whom the matter is remanded, is expected to adjudicate and decide the matter of afresh strictly in accordance with law, relying upon the material, case diary and evidence collected by concerned Investigating Officer, being uninfluenced by the observations made by the revisional court in its impugned order. "