M.Veerappan vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 February, 2019
The matter
was referred to the three Judges Bench reported in (1998) 7
SCC 157 (Arul Nadar V. A.O) .
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (1.20 seconds)Dr. P. Leela vs The Director Of Collegiate Education ... on 25 February, 1999
15. I am also obliged to refer to the decision of this Court in reported in The Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College, Sivakasi v. A. Pandian (1996) 2 M.L.J. 345 : 1996 W.L.R. 521, wherein this Court held as under:
Periyasamy Middle School Rep. By Its vs The Joint Director Of Elementary School ... on 5 March, 2013
15. If an approval is not obtained, the relationship between the teacher and the school management does not come to an end and the order of termination will not take effect unless approved by the authority. Section 19 of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act is pari materia with Section 22 of the Tamil Nadu Private Schools Act. A question which arose under Section 19 of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges Act came to be considered by this court vide judgment in The Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College, Sivakasi Vs. A.Pandian and others reported in 1996 Writ L.R. 521. The learned judge of this court in paragraph 24 had observed as follows :-
Nirmala vs N.Krishnaswamy Mudaliar on 6 March, 2012
10. It must be noted so long as the approval is not obtained from the competent authority, no order can be final. If any order is passed imposing punishment of dismissal, such dismissal order without any approval will become void ab initio as held by this Court in THE AYYA NADAR JANAKI AMMAL COLLEGE V. A.PANDIAN & ORS reported in
1996 2 CTC 337 = 1996 WLR 252. Para 23 reads as follows:-
X.Lazer vs The Director Of Collegiate Education on 12 June, 2012
32. The decisions made in Ayyan Nadar Janaki Ammal College's case and R.V.Thevar Memorial Girls High School's case (cited supra) squarely apply to the facts of this case, in so far as the fact that the order of termination of the petitioner has been made without adhering to the mandatory requirements and no contra materials have been produced by the respondents 3 and 4.
R.Santhakumari vs The Joint Director (Higher Secondary) on 7 February, 2013
15.If an approval is not obtained, the relationship between the teacher and the school management does not come to an end and the order of termination will not take effect unless approved by the authority. Section 19 of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act is pari materia with Section 22 of the Tamil Nadu Private Schools Act. A question which arose under Section 19 of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges Act came to be considered by this court vide judgment in The Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College, Sivakasi Vs. A.Pandian and others reported in 1996 Writ L.R. 521. The learned judge of this court in paragraph 24 had observed as follows :
Secretary vs Rexline Mary on 21 December, 2011
20. So long as the approval is not obtained from the competent authority,
no order can be final. If any order is passed imposing punishment of dismissal,
such dismissal order without any approval will become void abintio as held by
this Court in THE AYYA NADAR JANAKI AMMAL COLLEGE V. A.PANDIAN & ORS reported in
1996 2 CTC 337 = 1996 WLR 252 in para 23 which is as follows:-
Tamilavel Uma Maheswaranar Karanthai vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 25 June, 2012
In this connection, the learned single Judge has stated without
discussion the decisions reported in (i) Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College Vs.
A.Pandian & two others ( 1996 (II) CTC 337), (ii) Secretary School Committee,
Thiruvallur Higher Secondary School by Thiru K.N.Govindarajan Vs. Government of
Tamil Nadu rep by Secretary to Govt., Education Dept., Madras-9 & four others
(1996 (III) CTC 62), (iii) A.B.Narasimhan Vs. Management of Olcott Memorial
School and others (1996 Writ L.R. 543) and after detailed discussion about the
decision reported in (iv) Secretary School Committee, Thiruvallur Higher
Secondary School Vs. Govt of Tamil Nadu and others (2003) 5 SCC 200) and
finally held that the appellant has not obtained any approval which is
mandatory under the Act 1973 and dismissed the Writ Petitions.
R.Rajapandi vs The Chief Educational Officer on 17 November, 2011
16. A Division Bench of this Court while considering a similar provision
under Section 19(1) of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976
vide its judgment in THE AYYA NADAR JANAKI AMMAL COLLEGE V. A.PANDIAN & ORS
reported in 1996 2 CTC 337 = 1996 WLR 252 in paras 15 and 23 which is as
follows:-
1