Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1838 (1.02 seconds)

Ebera Nwanaforo vs Ncb on 31 May, 2022

49. The aspect that the directions in Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing Undertrial Prisoners (supra), cannot be contended to be only one-time directions in the said case is laid down in "Anil Kumar @ Nillu" (supra) of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, which verdict has not been challenged by the NCB, wherein observations therein vide paragraph 12 thereof are to the effect:-
Delhi High Court Cites 69 - Cited by 3 - A Malhotra - Full Document

Naeem vs State Nct Of Delhi on 5 March, 2024

In the present case, petitioner was admitted to bail after consideration of the case on merits and not on account of prolonged incarceration. The petitioner has not been able to avail the benefit of bail despite order dated 27.07.2023 passed by learned Trial Court and is still in custody. The observations of Hon'ble Apex Court in para 16 in Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (Representing Undertrial Prisoners) v. Union of India and Others (supra), clarifies that the directions are intended to operate as a one time measure and did not interfere with the Special Court's power to grant bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Thus, wherein the Court exercises Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C.326/2024 Page 7 of 8 Digitally Signed By:DINESH CHANDRA Signing Date:05.03.2024 14:50:36 the power to release the accused on bail on merits and if the circumstances so warrant, the surety bond can be suitably reduced.

Anil Kumar vs Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence ... on 22 December, 2022

9. The learned Sr. SC submits that the reliance placed by the learned counsel of applicant in the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (Representing Undertrial Prisoners) v. Union of India (supra) and the judgment of this Court in Atul Aggarwal (supra) is misplaced since the facts of those cases are completely different from those of the present case and thus, the law laid down therein does not apply here.
Delhi High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 1 - A Sharma - Full Document

Sumit Kumar Tiwari vs The State Of Bihar on 13 June, 2022

In view of the aforesaid judgment, paragraph 15 (iii), of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing Undertrial Prisoners vs. Union of India & Others (supra), this Court finds that the petitioner is in custody since 02.10.2016, as such, he has already completed a jail term of five years, thus, applying the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid decision along with the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6046 of 2022(2) dt.13-06-2022 4/4 fact that the similarly situated co-accused has been allowed bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner is entitled to the privilege of bail, subject to him fulfilling the conditions mentioned in paragraph no. 15 (i) to (vii) of the aforesaid judgment as also subject to the petitioner furnishing bail bond of a sum of Rs. one lac with two sureties of the like amount.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A K Jha - Full Document

Anil Kumar @ Nillu vs State on 21 March, 2022

In light of the above, applying the law that has been laid down by the Supreme Court in Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (Representing Undertrial Prisoners) v. Union of India (supra) and flowing from Section 37 of the NDPS Act which governs the powers pertaining to grant of bail, this Court is of the opinion that the instant case is fit for grant of bail. This Court BAIL APPLN. 1724/2021 Page 11 of 13 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SINGH KIRMOLIYA Signing Date:22.03.2022 10:32:39 is, therefore, inclined to grant bail to the Petitioner herein, subject to the following conditions:
Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 9 - S Prasad - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next