Halsnad Madappaya vs P. Mahabala Rao And Anr. on 10 September, 1936
I feel bound to follow the Division Bench ruling in Modhugari Narayana v. Venkataramanna AIR 1935 Mad 899, and I do not think that it can work any hardship; because if such a rare case did arise in which a mortgagor made an admission which was not against his interest, it would presumably be held that such an admission was no acknowledgment at all. I therefore find that Ex. O does amount to an acknowledgment and that the suit is therefore in time.