Manmohan Das And Ors. vs Bahauddin And Ors. on 11 January, 1957
In Kasturchand Okaji Marwadi v. Hari Govind, 36 Bom LR 1068: (AIR 1934 Bom 491) (Z 48), it was observed at p. 1073 (of Bom LR): (at p. 495 of AIR) :--
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.44 seconds)Documents citing
Kasturchand Okaji Marwadi vs Hari Govind Wagle on 21 February, 1934
K. Narendra vs Riviera Apartments (P) Ltd. on 18 December, 1992
Air 1957 MB. 177, Manjural Haque Vs. Smt. Mewajan Bibi and others, , Narsappa and another Vs. Bharmapa and others, Air 1921 Bombay 409, Gandu and others Vs. Mt. Nasibo and others, Mr 1938 Lahore 22, Kruttiventi Mallikharjuna Rao Vs. Vemur Pardhasaradhirao, Air 1944 Madras 218, Kasturch and Okaji Marwadi Vs. Hari Govind Wagle-, Air 1934 Bombay 491 and M/s. Shiv Hiraji Mining Industries and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, Air 1983 Bombay 82 (DB).
Tinna Overseas Limited vs Krm International Ltd. & Another on 28 May, 2010
(iv) Kasturchand Okaji Marwadi Vs. Hari Govind Wagle,
AIR 1934 Bombay 491
The Bombay High Court in this case held that Article
62 applies to suits for money payable by the defendant to
the plaintiff for money received by the defendant for the
plaintiff‟s use, and approved the dicta laid down by the
Calcutta High Court in Mahomed Wahib Vs. Mahomed
Ameer, (1905) 32 Calcutta 527 and the remaks of
Mookerjee, J. (p-533) :
The City Municipality vs Nusserwanji Hormusji Madon on 20 December, 1939
This was accepted as correct by our Court in Kasturchand v. Hari .
1