Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.17 seconds)
Documents citing The New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Uthra on 16 March, 2017

The United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Subramaniam on 6 April, 2023

8. The learned counsel for the appellant on the other hand relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, in United India Insurance Co.Ltd. Shimla Vs. Tilak Singh and others, reported in 2006 (2) CTC 661, and also judgment of this Court, in The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Salem vs. Uthra and others, reported in 2017 SCC OnLine Mad 15006, wherein it was held that in Act only policy the pillion rider was 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis not covered, therefore, the liability was that of the owner only.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co. ... vs M.Kothandabani on 16 April, 2024

2.The Tribunal, under the impugned Award, had relied upon a judgment of this Court in C.M.A. Nos.261 and 1067 of 2015 (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Uthra) dated 16.03.2017 for the purpose of making the appellant/Insurance Company liable to pay compensation. However, the Tribunal failed to take into consideration the well settled law that unless and until the additional premium is paid by the insured under IMT 29 to give coverage to the employees, who are travelling in the insured car, the question of payment of compensation by the Insurance Company does not arise.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Quddhose - Full Document

M/S.Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co. ... vs M.Kothandabani on 16 April, 2024

2.The Tribunal, under the impugned Award, had relied upon a judgment of this Court in C.M.A. Nos.261 and 1067 of 2015 (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Uthra) dated 16.03.2017 for the purpose of making the appellant/Insurance Company liable to pay compensation. However, the Tribunal failed to take into consideration the well settled law that unless and until the additional premium is paid by the insured under IMT 29 to give coverage to the employees, who are travelling in the insured car, the question of payment of compensation by the Insurance Company does not arise.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Quddhose - Full Document

K.Balaji vs Selvi on 7 August, 2025

7. Referring to Section 2(30) and 50 of the Motor Vehicles Act and placing reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Naveen Kumar Vs.Vijay Kumar reported in 2018-2-CTC-91 and also the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Vs. Uthra in CMA.Nos.261 & 1067 of 2015 dated 16.03.2017, we found that, when the registered owner has transferred the vehicle, but his name continues to be reflected as the owner in the record with the Registering authority, then he cannot be absolved from liability.
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1