Gaya Prashad vs Union Of India on 7 October, 2014
The respondents in their reply before the tribunal
had pleaded that the petitioners were engaged casually
without issuing any advertisement. Their names were not
sponsored by the Employment Exchange. Further they
were not appointed against sanctioned vacant posts. The
tribunal also directed the petitioners to submit details in
view of the objections raised by the respondents in the
return on the question of engagement/appointment of the
petitioners to ascertain whether any advertisement was
2 WP 740/14
Gaya Prasad & others Vs. Union of India & others
issued at the time of their appointment/engagement or
their names were sponsored by the Employment Exchange
or whether the appointment in question was made against
sanctioned vacant posts. The tribunal observed that the
petitioners failed to produce all the requisite informations/
details to satisfy their claim for regularization in service.