C. Abdul Basith Sahib vs Shanmughasundaram And Ors. on 9 December, 1955
300 (P.C.); Sahu v. Makhna (1939) 2 M.L.J. 569 : I.L.R. (1939) All.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)Documents citing
Ram Narain Sahu And Anr. vs Mt. Makhna on 2 April, 1935
Adiyalath Katheesumma And Anr. vs Adiyalath Beechu Alias Umma And Ors. on 4 March, 1949
In the case of Bamnarain Sahu v. Mt. Makhna, I. L. R. 1939 ALL. 680 : (A. i. R. (26) 1939 P. C. 174), their Lordships of the Judicial Committee held that if a coparcener, or if he is under a disability, any person entitled to act for him, demands a separation of his share in a pending suit for partition, there is a severance in status even though no relief is granted by the decree. Sir George Rankin in delivering the judgment of the Judicial Committee referred to the previous decisions of the Board in these terms:
1