Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 116 (1.54 seconds)
Documents citing Om Narain Agarwal And Ors. Etc vs Nagar Palika Shahjahanpur And Ors. Etc on 19 February, 1993

Tejan Chandrakar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2024

27. It then referred to a decision of Hon''ble the Supreme Court in the case of Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur, AIR 1993 SC 1440. In that case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 9 of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, which provided for nomination of a person as member of the Municipal Board by the State Government. The fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act provided that a member nominated under Section 9 shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government, Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:8141 37 but not beyond the term of the Board. Two nominated members, challenged the cancellation of their nomination before the expiry of their term. The Hon''ble Supreme Court negatived the challenge by observing as under:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Heeralal @ Heera Banjare vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2024

27. It then referred to a decision of Hon''ble the Supreme Court in the case of Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur, AIR 1993 SC 1440. In that case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 9 of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, which provided for nomination of a person as member of the Municipal Board by the State Government. The fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act provided that a member nominated under Section 9 shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government, Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:8141 37 but not beyond the term of the Board. Two nominated members, challenged the cancellation of their nomination before the expiry of their term. The Hon''ble Supreme Court negatived the challenge by observing as under:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Doman Markam vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2024

27. It then referred to a decision of Hon''ble the Supreme Court in the case of Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur, AIR 1993 SC 1440. In that case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 9 of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, which provided for nomination of a person as member of the Municipal Board by the State Government. The fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act provided that a member nominated under Section 9 shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government, Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:8141 37 but not beyond the term of the Board. Two nominated members, challenged the cancellation of their nomination before the expiry of their term. The Hon''ble Supreme Court negatived the challenge by observing as under:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Shanta Verma vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2024

27. It then referred to a decision of Hon''ble the Supreme Court in the case of Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur, AIR 1993 SC 1440. In that case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 9 of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, which provided for nomination of a person as member of the Municipal Board by the State Government. The fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act provided that a member nominated under Section 9 shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government, Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:8141 37 but not beyond the term of the Board. Two nominated members, challenged the cancellation of their nomination before the expiry of their term. The Hon''ble Supreme Court negatived the challenge by observing as under:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bholaram Deshmukh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2024

27. It then referred to a decision of Hon''ble the Supreme Court in the case of Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur, AIR 1993 SC 1440. In that case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 9 of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, which provided for nomination of a person as member of the Municipal Board by the State Government. The fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act provided that a member nominated under Section 9 shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government, Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:8141 37 but not beyond the term of the Board. Two nominated members, challenged the cancellation of their nomination before the expiry of their term. The Hon''ble Supreme Court negatived the challenge by observing as under:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanju Singh Chandel vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2024

27. It then referred to a decision of Hon''ble the Supreme Court in the case of Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur, AIR 1993 SC 1440. In that case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 9 of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, which provided for nomination of a person as member of the Municipal Board by the State Government. The fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act provided that a member nominated under Section 9 shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government, Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:8141 37 but not beyond the term of the Board. Two nominated members, challenged the cancellation of their nomination before the expiry of their term. The Hon''ble Supreme Court negatived the challenge by observing as under:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hemlal Sao vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2024

27. It then referred to a decision of Hon''ble the Supreme Court in the case of Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur, AIR 1993 SC 1440. In that case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 9 of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, which provided for nomination of a person as member of the Municipal Board by the State Government. The fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act provided that a member nominated under Section 9 shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government, Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:8141 37 but not beyond the term of the Board. Two nominated members, challenged the cancellation of their nomination before the expiry of their term. The Hon''ble Supreme Court negatived the challenge by observing as under:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sandeep Shukla vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2024

27. It then referred to a decision of Hon''ble the Supreme Court in the case of Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur, AIR 1993 SC 1440. In that case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 9 of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, which provided for nomination of a person as member of the Municipal Board by the State Government. The fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act provided that a member nominated under Section 9 shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government, Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:8141 37 but not beyond the term of the Board. Two nominated members, challenged the cancellation of their nomination before the expiry of their term. The Hon''ble Supreme Court negatived the challenge by observing as under:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajendra Shukla vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2024

27. It then referred to a decision of Hon''ble the Supreme Court in the case of Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur, AIR 1993 SC 1440. In that case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 9 of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, which provided for nomination of a person as member of the Municipal Board by the State Government. The fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act provided that a member nominated under Section 9 shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government, Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:8141 37 but not beyond the term of the Board. Two nominated members, challenged the cancellation of their nomination before the expiry of their term. The Hon''ble Supreme Court negatived the challenge by observing as under:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajendra Kumar Soni vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2024

27. It then referred to a decision of Hon''ble the Supreme Court in the case of Om Narain Agarwal v. Nagar Palika, Shahjahanpur, AIR 1993 SC 1440. In that case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 9 of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, which provided for nomination of a person as member of the Municipal Board by the State Government. The fourth proviso to Section 9 of the Act provided that a member nominated under Section 9 shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government, Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:8141 37 but not beyond the term of the Board. Two nominated members, challenged the cancellation of their nomination before the expiry of their term. The Hon''ble Supreme Court negatived the challenge by observing as under:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next