Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 195 (1.20 seconds)
Documents citing Gurdial Singh & Ors vs Raj Kumar Aneja & Ors on 4 February, 2002

Sunil Gandhi vs Ramnaresh Singh on 2 February, 2024

12. Thus, this Court holds that the learned Trial Court had not committed any illegality or irregularity in rejecting the application preferred by the petitioner/defendant No.1(a) under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 so also looking to the judgment passed by the Honb'le Apex Court in the matter of Gurdial Singh & Others vs. Raj Kumar Aneja (supra), the said consequential amendment could not have been allowed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M R Phadke - Full Document

Deloitte Haskins And Sells Llp vs Union Of India on 15 May, 2025

21. Learned counsel for the Appellant has relied on judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gurdial Singh & Ors. vs. Raj Kumar Aneja, (2002) 2 SCC 445". The above was a case where the Hon'ble Supreme Court was considering the provisions of Section 153 and Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. It is useful to extract Para 13, 14 & 15 of the judgment:
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full Document

Manu Kochhar vs Union Of India on 15 May, 2025

21. Learned counsel for the Appellant has relied on judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gurdial Singh & Ors. vs. Raj Kumar Aneja, (2002) 2 SCC 445". The above was a case where the Hon'ble Supreme Court was considering the provisions of Section 153 and Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. It is useful to extract Para 13, 14 & 15 of the judgment:
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full Document

Kalpesh J. Mehta vs Union Of India on 15 May, 2025

21. Learned counsel for the Appellant has relied on judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gurdial Singh & Ors. vs. Raj Kumar Aneja, (2002) 2 SCC 445". The above was a case where the Hon'ble Supreme Court was considering the provisions of Section 153 and Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. It is useful to extract Para 13, 14 & 15 of the judgment:
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full Document

Rajesh Kotian vs Union Of India Ministry Of Corporate ... on 15 May, 2025

21. Learned counsel for the Appellant has relied on judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gurdial Singh & Ors. vs. Raj Kumar Aneja, (2002) 2 SCC 445". The above was a case where the Hon'ble Supreme Court was considering the provisions of Section 153 and Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. It is useful to extract Para 13, 14 & 15 of the judgment:
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full Document

Milind Patel vs Union Of India & Ors on 15 May, 2025

21. Learned counsel for the Appellant has relied on judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gurdial Singh & Ors. vs. Raj Kumar Aneja, (2002) 2 SCC 445". The above was a case where the Hon'ble Supreme Court was considering the provisions of Section 153 and Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. It is useful to extract Para 13, 14 & 15 of the judgment:
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full Document

Kalpesh Mehta vs Union Of India on 15 May, 2025

21. Learned counsel for the Appellant has relied on judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gurdial Singh & Ors. vs. Raj Kumar Aneja, (2002) 2 SCC 445". The above was a case where the Hon'ble Supreme Court was considering the provisions of Section 153 and Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. It is useful to extract Para 13, 14 & 15 of the judgment:
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next