Rajinder Kumar And Ors. vs Soma Devi And Ors. on 12 May, 2000
12. So far document at serial No. (b) is concerned, it is not necessary, as the factum of marriage has been admitted by respondent-claimant No. 1. So far as documents at serial Nos. (a), (c) and (d) are concerned, no explanation has been given why these were not produced before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. It cannot be believed that these were not within the knowledge of the appellants, as alleged by them in their application. Their averments in this regard are very vague as they have not stated when they acquired the knowledge of these documents. Otherwise also, these documents are not required by us for pronouncing the judgment in the appeal. The judgment, Ram Gopal v. Madhya Pradesh State Road Trans. Corporation 1995 ACJ 845 (MP), cited by learned counsel for the appellants is of no assistance to him as in that case the application for additional evidence was allowed in view of the order of remand passed in the appeal.