Similarly, in the case of Sri Chand Gupta vs. Gulzar Singh,
AIR 1992 SC 123, there is no principle of law which requires to be
applied to the present case on hand relying on the same.
II. The second Test in which interference with findings
of fact is permissible is where a finding has been
arrived at by the Court by placing reliance on
inadmissible evidence which if it was omitted, an
opposite conclusion was possible. (Sri Chand Gupta vs.
Gulzar Singh 1992 (1) SCC 143).
In Sri Chand Gupta v.
Gulzar Singh (1992) 1 SCC 143 it was held that the High
Court was right in interfering in the second appeal where
the lower appellate court relied upon an admission of a
::: Downloaded on - 25/09/2023 20:33:16 :::CIS 13
third party treating it as binding on the defendant. The
admission was inadmissible as against the defendant.
This was also a second appeal of 1981 disposed of on 24-
.
In Sri Chand Gupta vs. Gulzar Singh [1992 (1) SCC
143], it was held that the High Court was right in interfering
in Second Appeal where the lower appellate Court relied
upon an admission of a third party treating it as binding on
the defendant. The admission was inadmissible as against the
defendant. This was also a Second Appeal of 1981 disposed
of on 24.9.1985".
In Sri Chand Gupta vs. Gulzar Singh [1992 (1) SCC
143], it was held that the High Court was right in interfering
in Second Appeal where the lower appellate Court relied
upon an admission of a third party treating it as binding on
the defendant. The admission was inadmissible as against the
defendant. This was also a Second Appeal of 1981 disposed
of on 24.9.1985".
In Sri
Chand Gupta vs. Gulzar Singh [1992 (1) SCC 143],
it was held that the High Court was right in
interfering in Second Appeal where the lower
appellate Court relied upon an admission of a third
party treating it as binding on the defendant. The
admission was inadmissible as against the defendant.
This was also a Second Appeal of 1981 disposed of
on 24.9.1985".
In Sri
Chand Gupta vs. Gulzar Singh [1992 (1) SCC 143],
it was held that the High Court was right in
interfering in Second Appeal where the lower
appellate Court relied upon an admission of a third
party treating it as binding on the defendant. The
admission was inadmissible as against the defendant.
This was also a Second Appeal of 1981 disposed of
on 24.9.1985".
In Sri Chand Gupta vs. Gulzar Singh [1992 (1) SCC
143], it was held that the High Court was right in interfering
in Second Appeal where the lower appellate Court relied
upon an admission of a third party treating it as binding on
the defendant. The admission was inadmissible as against the
defendant. This was also a Second Appeal of 1981 disposed
of on 24.9.1985".
In Sri Chand Gupta vs. Gulzar Singh [1992 (1) SCC
143], it was held that the High Court was right in interfering
in Second Appeal where the lower appellate Court relied
upon an admission of a third party treating it as binding on
the defendant. The admission was inadmissible as against the
defendant. This was also a Second Appeal of 1981 disposed
of on 24.9.1985".
In Sri Chand Gupta vs. Gulzar Singh [1992 (1) SCC
143], it was held that the High Court was right in interfering
in Second Appeal where the lower appellate Court relied
upon an admission of a third party treating it as binding on
the defendant. The admission was inadmissible as against the
defendant. This was also a Second Appeal of 1981 disposed
of on 24.9.1985".