Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)
Documents citing Jetha Lal Laxmi Chand Shah vs Amrita Lal Ojha on 7 April, 1938

Sayyad Badruddin Sayyad Murtuza Saheb ... vs Karnataka State Board Of Wakfs, ... on 12 August, 1994

In support of his submission, he relied on the declarations rendered in the cases of Sailendra Nath Ghosal v. Smt. Ena Dutt and/Phool Chand v. Amrit Lal, . His further submission is that it was on the respondent-Board to establish and prove that the property in question had in fact been dedicated to the Wakf, by producing document of dedication or any other acceptable evidence, which the Board has failed to produce in the present case. According to him, unless this onus is discharged by the Board the property in question could not have been held as that of the Wakf.
Karnataka High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Strawboard Manufacturing Co., Ltd vs Gutta Mill Workers' Union.The State Of ... on 17 December, 1952

Eventually the, decision of Mr. Justice Harrington was dissented from by a Division Bench of the same High Court sitting in appeal from the Original Side in Jetha Lal Laxmi Chand Shah v. Amrita Lal Ojha(4), which held that the Court had power to enlarge the time for making the award even after the award had (1) I.L.R.38 Cal. 522. (3) 18 C.W.N. 1325.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 60 - Full Document

G. Chokkappa Chetty vs M. Santhubava Rowther on 25 April, 1940

6. Jetha Lal Laxmi Chand Shah v. Amrita Lal Ojha I.L.R. (1938) 2 Cal. 482 is a very important decision on the present paragraph 8 of Schedule XI; for it holds that the section is so widely worded that an application for extension of time put in even after the award is made can be granted; and that if it is granted the award can be filed. The wording of paragraph 8 is certainly wide enough to carry this meaning and with due respect I agree. I find no reason in the present provisions relating to arbitration for supposing that once an award is made the Court ceases to have jurisdiction to extend the time. The old Code did contain such a provision; but that is absent in the present Act.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1