Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.00 seconds)

Shatakshi Mishra vs Deepak Mahendra Pandey (Deceased) And 2 ... on 8 May, 2024

In Garima Singh (supra), the first wife has claimed that her marriage was subsisting when second marriage was performed by the husband and as such, in the light of the provisions of Section 5 of the Act, the second marriage performed by the husband with the appellant-Garima Singh was void ab initio. Indisputably, the property rights are always involved in such cases when the marriage itself is being claimed as void ab initio. Therefore, clearly, the rights of the parties who are legal representatives of the deceased husband are also affected. Hence, in the present case, the parents have a right to get a declaration that the marriage between Shatakshi Mishra, the appellant herein and their son was in violation of provisions of Section 5 of the Act as their property rights are directly affected and they have a right to be made a party to the petition under Section 11 of the Act after the death of their son.
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document

Vineeta Dwivedi vs Lalit Kumar Dwivedi And 2 Others on 16 January, 2024

6. We find substance in the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner. We have also noticed that in a recent judgment passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Garima Singh vs. Pratima Singh and others 2023(9) ADJ 101 the question as to whether first wife is entitled or not to file case under Section 11 and 17 of the Hindu Marriage Act for declaring her husband's marriage with another woman, as null and void was considered and after discussion it was held that the first wife is also entitled to do so.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document
1