Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (0.77 seconds)
Documents citing Phulia Tudu And Anr vs The State Of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) on 14 September, 2007

Saravanan vs The State on 24 January, 2017

In the case of Phulia Tudu & Anr. v. State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) [AIR 2007 SC 3215], the Court noticed that confusion is caused if courts, losing sight of the true scope and meaning of the terms used by the legislature in these sections, allow themselves to be drawn into minute abstractions. The safest way of approach to the interpretation and application of these provisions seems to be to keep in focus the keywords used in the various clauses of these sections.
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - M M Sundresh - Full Document

Nirmal Sarkar vs State Represented By on 19 August, 2019

In the case of Phulia Tudu & Anr. v. State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) [AIR 2007 SC 3215], the Court noticed that confusion is caused if courts, losing sight of the true scope and meaning of the terms used by the legislature in these sections, allow themselves to be drawn into minute abstractions. The safest way of approach to the interpretation and application of these provisions seems to be to keep in focus the keywords used in the various clauses of these sections.
Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - M M Sundresh - Full Document

Mukesh Kr. Kwatra vs . Chanchal Mehta on 3 February, 2020

(DHC) 189 titled Vipul Kumar Gupta Vs. Vipin Gupta, Criminal Appeal No. 1012 of 1999 titled M. S. Narayana Menon @ Mani Vs. State of Kerela & Anr., Criminal Appeal No. 698/2006 titled R. Kalavathi Vs. The State of Tamilnadu & Ors., Criminal Appeal No. 2045/2008 titled M/s. Kumar Exports Vs. Sharma Carpets, 2007 (1) JCC (NI) 6 Virender Singh Vs. Laxmi Narain & Anr., Criminal Appeal No. 1650/2002 titled M. Senguttuvan Vs. Mahadevaswamy, Criminal Appeal No. 1221/2007 dt. 14.9.2007 titled Phulia Tudu and Anr. Vs. The State of Bihar (now Jharkhand), 2010 (1) JCC (NI) 98 titled M/s. Alliance Infrastructure Project Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vinay Mittal, 2010 (1) JCC (NI) 105 Som Sugandh Vs. UOI & Anr. relied upon by the accused is set out in different fact situations and thus this judgment cannot be applied to the facts of the present case and is of no assistance to the accused. It is well settled that a judgment of a Court is only an authority for what it actually decides and not what logically follows from it and judgment of the Court is not to be read mechanically as a Euclids Theorem nor as if it was a statute.
Delhi District Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Devesh Kumar @ Neeraj Dixit & Anr. vs State Of U.P., on 18 January, 2021

In the case of Phulia Tudu and Anr. v. State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) [MANU/SC/7909/2007 : AIR 2007 SC 3215], the Court noticed that confusion is caused if courts, losing sight of the true scope and meaning of the terms used by the legislature in these sections, allow themselves to be drawn into minute abstractions. The safest way of approach to the interpretation and application of these provisions seems to be to keep in focus the keywords used in the various clauses of these sections. The Court provided the following comparative table to help in appreciating the points of discussion between these two offences:
Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - D K Upadhyaya - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next