Rajasthan Cricket Association vs State Of Rajasthan Through The ... on 10 December, 2018
(a) Counsel submitted that two writ petitions are pending before
this court i.e. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.12961/2017 (Jaipur District
Cricket Association and Anr. Vs. The Registrar, Co-operative
Societies and Ors.) and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9560/2014
(Nikhil Doru and Ors. Vs. Board of Control for Cricket & Anr.)
where this court when was apprised about enquiry being
conducted by the Enquiry Officer and the Registrar had not passed
the final order, this court had specifically observed that the
Registrar was free to proceed in the matter but it would remain
subject to outcome of the writ petition. Counsel submitted that if
at all the Registrar had to act on the enquiry report, it was
incumbent upon him to first seek permission of this court to make
the order effective. Counsel submitted that the interim order
passed by this court on 24.08.2018 in fact has been violated by
the Registrar by passing the impugned order. Counsel submitted
that in the impugned order itself, the Registrar has quoted the
order of this Court and has further mentioned that order passed
by him will be subject to outcome of the writ petitions i.e. S.B.Civil
Writ Petition Nos.12961/2017 and 9560/2014. Counsel submitted
that even if the Registrar was bold enough to give effect to the
enquiry report and the order accordingly, at least it would have
been in the fitness of things to seek prior order/approval to give
effect to the said order.