Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.38 seconds)
Documents citing Dr. Jitendra Nath Pandey Son Of Shri ... vs The State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ... on 5 February, 2007

Smt. Jyotsna Fernandez W/O Sri James ... vs The Union Of India Through Its General ... on 7 September, 2012

7. The learned counsel for the respondents has argued stressing that Accounts office while verifying /vetting the services of the applicant detected that certain amount was overpaid to applicant and therefore the amount was deducted from his retrial dues and that the amount paid in excess has rightly been recovered, as the mistake committed by the respondents in fixation of pay or payment of salary could be rectified as held in the case of V.K. Upadhyaya vs. State of U.P. and others reported in (2009) UPLBEC 1918.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shiv Naresh Singh & Ors. vs State Of U.P. & Anr. on 4 September, 2020

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the judgment and order dated 06.01.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/ F.T.C. No.1, Gonda in Criminal Revision No. 103/2019 (Anand Nath Pandey Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.) and order dated 02.03.2020 passed by the learned IIIrd Additional Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Gonda in compliant Case No. 1153/2018.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V K Srivastava - Full Document

Jitendra Nath Upadhyay vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 2 April, 2026

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and grant interim relief as directing to contesting respondent to not close the disputed Gate during the pendency of this misc. petition and it is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the impugned judgment and order dated 21.11.2025 passed by the Learned Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Varanasi in Criminal Revision case no.297 of 2023 (Jitendra Nath Upadhyay Vs. State of U.P. and others), as well as judgment and order dated 28.07.2023 passed by Sub-District Magistrate (S.D.M.)
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Braj Shyam vs Settlement Officer Of Consolidation ... on 2 August, 2010

It is stated that against the order dated 28.3.2007 passed by Consolidation Officer, Basti in Case No. 1173 in respect of Khata No. 373 of village Sandpur, Tappa Dubauliya, Pargana Amodha, Tehsil Harraiya, District Basti, Appeal No. 1413 of 2010 (Braj Shyam Vs. State of U.P. and another), under Section 11 of U.P.C.H. Act has been filed by the petitioner, which is still pending. The petitioner has also moved application for staying the order passed by Consolidation Officer.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1