Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 990 (8.13 seconds)
Documents citing Public Services Tribunal Bar ... vs State Of U.P. & Another on 29 January, 2003

Brijesh Kumar Chaubey vs Kvs on 10 May, 2023

37. The Apex Court in series of judgments like Gujarat Electricity Board Vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani (Supra), Union of India Vs S.L. Abbas (supra),Public Services Tribunal Bar ... Vs State Of U.P. & Another(Supra), State of UP &Ors Vs Govardhan Lal (supra),Airport Authority of India Vs Rajeev Ratan Pandey and Ors (supra), Rajendra Singh &Ors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh &Ors(Supra) , State Of Haryana &Ors Vs 29 Item No.31 (Court No.6) OA No.3745 of 2022 Kashmir Singh &Ors (supra), Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar (supra), Union of India and Others Vs. Ganesh Dass Singh (supra), has given upper hand to the administrative authorities or the Government in matters of Transfers. In all those judgments, the Apex Court held that the Public Interest is paramount in such administrative exercises and there is very limited scope for judicial review in the matters of transfer. As it has been held in the other set of judgments cited in paragarph 36 above, unless there is malafide, bias, infringement of statutory provisions, lack of competency, non-application of mind, etc, the courts and tribunals should not interfere in the administrative decision in respect of transfers. In the instant case, as we have already discussed above, we do not find any such bias or non- application of mind in the present case.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jyoti Bala Pal vs Kvs on 27 March, 2023

36. the Apex Court in series of judgments like Gujarat Electricity Board Vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani (Supra), Union of India Vs S.L. Abbas (supra),Public Services Tribunal Bar ... Vs State Of U.P. & Another(Supra), State of UP &Ors Vs Govardhan Lal 31 OA No.734 of 2023 Court No.6 (item No.13) (supra),Airport Authority of India Vs Rajeev Ratan Pandey and Ors (supra), Rajendra Singh &Ors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh &Ors(Supra) , State Of Haryana &Ors Vs Kashmir Singh &Ors (supra), Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar (supra), Union of India and Others Vs. Ganesh Dass Singh (supra), has given upper hand to the administrative authorities or the Government in matters of Transfers. In all those judgments, the Apex Court held that the Public Interest is paramount in such administrative exercises and there is very limited scope for judicial review in the matters of transfer. As it has been held in the other set of judgments cited in paragarph 36 above, unless there is malafide, bias, infringement of statutory provisions, lack of competency, non-application of mind, etc, the courts and tribunals should not interfere in the administrative decision in respect of transfers. In the instant case, as we have already discussed above, we do not find any such bias or non-application of mind in the present case.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sushma Rani vs Home Affairs on 10 November, 2023

31. The Apex Court in series of judgments like Gujarat Electricity Board Vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani (Supra), Union of India Vs S.L. Abbas (supra), Public Services Tribunal Bar ... Vs State Of U.P. & Another(Supra), State of UP &Ors Vs Govardhan Lal (supra),Airport Authority of India Vs Rajeev Ratan Pandey and Ors (supra), Rajendra Singh &Ors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh &Ors(Supra), State Of Haryana &Ors Vs Kashmir Singh &Ors (supra), Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar (supra), Union of India and Others Vs. Ganesh Dass Singh (supra), has given upper hand to the administrative authorities or the Government in matters of Transfers. In all those judgments, the Apex Court held that the Public Interest is paramount in such administrative exercises and there is very limited scope for judicial review in the 25 OA No.3792 of 2022 Court No.5 (item No.41) matters of transfer. As it has been held in the other set of judgments cited in paragraph 27 above, unless there is malafide, bias, infringement of statutory provisions, lack of competency, non-application of mind, etc, the courts and tribunals should not interfere in the administrative decision in respect of transfers. In the instant case, as we have already discussed above, I do not find any such bias or non-application of mind in the present case.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jaya Purwar vs Kvs on 27 March, 2023

38. The last averment by the applicant that she deserves sympathetic consideration on account of the impeding hardship she would face because of her transfer beyond 500 kms from the existing place of posting, daugter's education, husband's employment in IPL (a non-government/non-PSU organization in UP), old parents-in-law, etc. have been duly considered by 31 OA No.608 of 2023 Court No.6 (item No.2) the Respondents in the impugned order dated13.1.2023. Moreover, the Apex Court in series of judgments like Gujarat Electricity Board Vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani (Supra), Union of India Vs S.L. Abbas (supra),Public Services Tribunal Bar ... Vs State Of U.P. & Another(Supra), State of UP &Ors Vs Govardhan Lal (supra),Airport Authority of India Vs Rajeev Ratan Pandey and Ors (supra), Rajendra Singh &Ors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh &Ors(Supra) , State Of Haryana &Ors Vs Kashmir Singh &Ors (supra), Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar (supra), Union of India and Others Vs. Ganesh Dass Singh (supra), has given upper hand to the administrative authorities or the Government in matters of Transfers. In all those judgments, the Apex Court held that the Public Interest is paramount in such administrative exercises and there is very limited scope for judicial review in the matters of transfer. As it has been held in the other set of judgments cited in paragarph 34 above, unless there is malafide, bias, infringement of statutory provisions, lack of competency, non-application of mind, etc, the courts and tribunals should not interfere in the administrative decision in respect of transfers. In the instant case, as 32 OA No.608 of 2023 Court No.6 (item No.2) we have already discussed above, we do not find any such bias or non-application of mind in the present case.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manju Bajpai vs Kvs on 25 April, 2023

39. The Apex Court in series of judgments like Gujarat Electricity Board Vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani (Supra), Union of India Vs S.L. Abbas (supra),Public Services Tribunal Bar ... Vs State Of U.P. & Another(Supra), State of UP &Ors Vs Govardhan Lal (supra),Airport Authority of India Vs Rajeev Ratan Pandey and Ors (supra), Rajendra Singh &Ors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh &Ors(Supra) , State Of Haryana &Ors Vs Kashmir Singh &Ors (supra), Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar (supra), Union of India and Others Vs. Ganesh Dass Singh (supra), has given upper hand to the administrative authorities or the Government in matters of Transfers. In all those judgments, the Apex Court held that the Public Interest is paramount in such administrative exercises and there is very limited scope for judicial review in the matters of transfer. As it has been held in the other set of judgments cited in paragarph 36 above, unless there is malafide, bias, 32 OA No.3751 of 2022 Court No.6 (item No.32) infringement of statutory provisions, lack of competency, non-application of mind, etc, the courts and tribunals should not interfere in the administrative decision in respect of transfers. In the instant case, as we have already discussed above, we do not find any such bias or non-application of mind in the present case.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next