Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (3.03 seconds)
Documents citing Ms. Seema vs Delhi Subordinate Selection Board ... on 20 May, 2014

Bharti vs Dsssb on 7 November, 2025

3.6 The new Rules came into exsitence , in compliance with with the directions of Seema & Ors. vs DSSSB the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 430/2020 titled ""Seema &Ors.,,,, the matter was placed before and approved by the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, for the adoption of a uniform age limit for both male and female candidates idates to ensure equality and uniformity. Accordingly, the existing RRs prescribing a maximum age of 30 years for both male and female candidates were duly vetted by the UPSC and approved by the Hon'ble Lt. Governor, Delhi. Hence, the non-extension years of age relaxation to female candidates under the new extension of 10 years RRs is in accordance with the policy decision. DOPT guidelines, and directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal, and is neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Indu Bala vs Dsssb on 7 November, 2025

3.6 The new Rules came into exsitence , in compliance with with the directions of Seema & Ors. vs DSSSB the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 430/2020 titled ""Seema &Ors.,,,, the matter was placed before and approved by the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, for the adoption of a uniform age limit for both male and female candidates idates to ensure equality and uniformity. Accordingly, the existing RRs prescribing a maximum age of 30 years for both male and female candidates were duly vetted by the UPSC and approved by the Hon'ble Lt. Governor, Delhi. Hence, the non-extension years of age relaxation to female candidates under the new extension of 10 years RRs is in accordance with the policy decision. DOPT guidelines, and directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal, and is neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jyoti vs Dsssb on 7 November, 2025

3.6 The new Rules came into exsitence , in compliance with with the directions of Seema & Ors. vs DSSSB the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 430/2020 titled ""Seema &Ors.,,,, the matter was placed before and approved by the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, for the adoption of a uniform age limit for both male and female candidates idates to ensure equality and uniformity. Accordingly, the existing RRs prescribing a maximum age of 30 years for both male and female candidates were duly vetted by the UPSC and approved by the Hon'ble Lt. Governor, Delhi. Hence, the non-extension years of age relaxation to female candidates under the new extension of 10 years RRs is in accordance with the policy decision. DOPT guidelines, and directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal, and is neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pratima Kundu vs Dsssb on 7 November, 2025

3.6 The new Rules came into exsitence , in compliance with with the directions of Seema & Ors. vs DSSSB the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 430/2020 titled ""Seema &Ors.,,,, the matter was placed before and approved by the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, for the adoption of a uniform age limit for both male and female candidates idates to ensure equality and uniformity. Accordingly, the existing RRs prescribing a maximum age of 30 years for both male and female candidates were duly vetted by the UPSC and approved by the Hon'ble Lt. Governor, Delhi. Hence, the non-extension years of age relaxation to female candidates under the new extension of 10 years RRs is in accordance with the policy decision. DOPT guidelines, and directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal, and is neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Roshan vs Dsssb on 7 November, 2025

3.6 The new Rules came into exsitence , in compliance with with the directions of Seema & Ors. vs DSSSB the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 430/2020 titled ""Seema &Ors.,,,, the matter was placed before and approved by the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, for the adoption of a uniform age limit for both male and female candidates idates to ensure equality and uniformity. Accordingly, the existing RRs prescribing a maximum age of 30 years for both male and female candidates were duly vetted by the UPSC and approved by the Hon'ble Lt. Governor, Delhi. Hence, the non-extension years of age relaxation to female candidates under the new extension of 10 years RRs is in accordance with the policy decision. DOPT guidelines, and directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal, and is neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepti Chetan vs Dsssb on 7 November, 2025

3.6 The new Rules came into exsitence , in compliance with with the directions of Seema & Ors. vs DSSSB the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 430/2020 titled ""Seema &Ors.,,,, the matter was placed before and approved by the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, for the adoption of a uniform age limit for both male and female candidates idates to ensure equality and uniformity. Accordingly, the existing RRs prescribing a maximum age of 30 years for both male and female candidates were duly vetted by the UPSC and approved by the Hon'ble Lt. Governor, Delhi. Hence, the non-extension years of age relaxation to female candidates under the new extension of 10 years RRs is in accordance with the policy decision. DOPT guidelines, and directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal, and is neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sonia vs Dsssb on 7 November, 2025

3.6 The new Rules came into exsitence , in compliance with with the directions of Seema & Ors. vs DSSSB the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 430/2020 titled ""Seema &Ors.,,,, the matter was placed before and approved by the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, for the adoption of a uniform age limit for both male and female candidates idates to ensure equality and uniformity. Accordingly, the existing RRs prescribing a maximum age of 30 years for both male and female candidates were duly vetted by the UPSC and approved by the Hon'ble Lt. Governor, Delhi. Hence, the non-extension years of age relaxation to female candidates under the new extension of 10 years RRs is in accordance with the policy decision. DOPT guidelines, and directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal, and is neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anchal Singh vs Dsssb on 7 November, 2025

3.6 The new Rules came into exsitence , in compliance with with the directions of Seema & Ors. vs DSSSB the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 430/2020 titled ""Seema &Ors.,,,, the matter was placed before and approved by the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, for the adoption of a uniform age limit for both male and female candidates idates to ensure equality and uniformity. Accordingly, the existing RRs prescribing a maximum age of 30 years for both male and female candidates were duly vetted by the UPSC and approved by the Hon'ble Lt. Governor, Delhi. Hence, the non-extension years of age relaxation to female candidates under the new extension of 10 years RRs is in accordance with the policy decision. DOPT guidelines, and directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal, and is neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Samay Singh vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 6 November, 2017

6.3 As far as limitation is concerned, Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Ms. Nirmala's case (supra) has already set aside the order of this Tribunal dismissing a similar O.A. on the grounds of limitation. Thus, this issue stands settled. Since the result of the ST category has still not been declared by the respondents, the question of limitation in this case does not arise.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next