Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (1.34 seconds)
Documents citing Arvind Pappu vs State (Delhi Administration) on 10 May, 1999

Mohd. Anulludin vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 December, 2014

In Pappu Vs. State of Delhi, one of the main reason for the acquittal was that PW-1 was found to be speaking half truth as well admission of the Prosecutrix that she was deposing at the behest of her mother, suggestive of the fact that Prosecutrix was a tutored witness and false implication was motivated by the father of the Prosecutrix to settle the score with the Appellant as he suspected that his wife was having illicit relationship with the Appellant and even Prosecutrix referred to the Appellant as Papa.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - P Rani - Full Document

Atender Yadav vs State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 October, 2013

58. The Division Bench of this court in the case of Pappu vs. State of Delhi, reported in 2010 (1) Cri.LJ 580 Delhi was also dealing with similar medical condition of the prosecutrix of six years of age whose hymen was also found torn and her vagina admitted two fingers easily and no injury was found on private part, and the Division bench after placing reliance on the medical jurisprudence (5th Edition by Dr. R.M. Jhala and B.B. Raju) held as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 22 - K Gambhir - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar @ Goldi & Ors vs State Of Punjab on 24 January, 2023

In such circumstances, the inference of guilt can be justified only when all the incriminating facts and circumstances are found to be incompatible with the innocence of the accused or the guilt of any person [See: Sharad Birdi Chand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1984 Supreme Court 1622; Brajendrasingh v. State of M.P., 2012 (4) SCC 289; Shivaji Sahebrao Bobade and another v. State of Maharashtra, (1973) 2 SCC 793; Padala Veera Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1990(2) Recent Criminal Reports 26 (SC); Vijay Shankar v. State of Haryana, (2015) 12 SCC 644; Arvind @ Pappu v. State (Delhi Administration), 1999 (2) RCR (Criminal) 810 and State of Rajasthan v. Rajaram, 2003 (47) ACC 635 (SC)].
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 1 - R Bahri - Full Document

Beeru vs State Nct Of Delhi on 11 December, 2013

24. The Division Bench of this court in the matter of Pappu vs. State of Delhi, 2010 (1) Cri.LJ 580 Delhi dealing with similar medical condition of the prosecutrix of six years of age whose hymen was also found torn and her vagina admitted two fingers easily and no injury found on private part, after placing reliance on the medical jurisprudence (5th Edition by Dr. R.M. Jhala and B.B. Raju) held as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 11 - K Gambhir - Full Document

State vs . on 8 August, 2014

In Pappu Vs. State of Delhi, 2010 (1) Cril.L.J. 580, Delhi also the Division Bench after placing reliance upon medical jurisprudence (5th Edition by Dr. R.M. Jhala and B.B. Raju) observed that " The reason is obvious from medical jurisprudence evidences that in adolescent girls the hymen is situated relatively more posteriorly and for said reason, there is a possibility of rape being committed without the hymen being torn; the converse whereof would be that if the hymen of an adolescent girl is torn due to rape, the penetration has to be a deep penetration. The medical jurisprudence guides that the labia majora are the first to be encountered by the male organ and they are subjected to blunt forceful blows, depending on the vigour and the force used by the accused and counteracted by the victim. The narrowness of the vaginal canal makes it inevitable for the male organ to inflict blunt, forceful blows on the labia and such blows lead to contusion because of looseness and vascularity. The feature of such contusion is revealed against the pink background of the mucous membrane dark red contusion being evident to the naked eye".
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Ashwani Kumar S/O Manohar Lal on 11 August, 2014

"24. The Division Bench of this court in the matter of Pappu vs. State of Delhi 2010 (1) Cri. LJ 580 (Delhi) dealing with similar medical SC No.163/13 State vs. Ashwani Kumar Page 35 of 42 condition of the prosecutrix of six years of age whose hymen was also found torn and her vagina admitted two fingers easily and no injury found on private part, after placing reliance on the medical jurisprudence (5th Edition by Dr. R. M. Jhala and BB Raju) held as under:-
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Anil Kaushik S/O Prem Kaushik on 24 September, 2014

"24. The Division Bench of this court in the matter of Pappu vs. State of Delhi 2010 (1) SC No. 42/13 State vs. Anil Kaushik Page 19 of 30 Cri. LJ 580 (Delhi) dealing with similar medical condition of the prosecutrix of six years of age whose hymen was also found torn and her vagina admitted two fingers easily and no injury found on private part, after placing reliance on the medical jurisprudence (5th Edition by Dr. R. M. Jhala and BB Raju) held as under:-
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next