Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Sh. Des Raj Batra vs State Of Haryana And Others on 22 August, 2013

Sonia vs Haryan Electricity Regulatory ... on 26 August, 2021

In another judgment by the Single Bench of this Court, Raj Kumar Batra vs. State of Haryana, in CWP No. 13991 of 1990, decided on 16.7.1991, it was observed that when the Government corrected the seniority on a successive representation of any employee, then the decision of the Government which is factually correct cannot be interfered by the court merely on the ground that the decision has been taken after a long delay and further the Government can undo a wrong any time, the delay can be a bar in granting relief by the court but not when a mistake is corrected by the Government itself.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - H S Madaan - Full Document

Bhagwan Dass vs M/O Railways on 19 February, 2019

7. Vide Annexure R-1, the 6th CPC has issued a concordance table of pre-1996, pre-2006 and post-2006 pay scales/pay bands to facilitate payment of revised pension. In this 4 O.A.060/00163/2018 concordance table, the pre-1996 scale of applicant as admitted by himself in OA was Rs. 1400-2300 and was replaced to Rs. 4500-7000 w.e.f. 01.01.1996. This scale was further revised to Rs. 5200-20,200 with Grade Pay of Rs. 2800 w.e.f 01.01.2006. Whereas the applicant's pension should have been fixed in the scale of Rs. 4500- 7000, it was inadvertently fixed in the scale of Rs. 5000-8000 by the respondents which was one scale above the entitlement of the pensioner. The respondents in support of their contentions, submitted that it is a well-settled law that a factual mistake can be rectified as held in Raj Kumar Batra Vs. State of Haryana, 1992(1) SCT 129 and Chandigarh Administration Vs. Naran Singh, JT 1997(3) SC 536.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document
1