Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 120 (2.90 seconds)
Documents citing A. Manjula Bhashini & Ors vs M.D.,A.P.Women'S ... on 6 July, 2009

Bihar Local Bodies Employees ... vs The State Of Bihar on 21 October, 2022

75. Therefore, as held in Excide Industries Ltd.72 and A. Patna High Court CWJC No.11717 of 2021 dt.21-10-2022 69/143 Manjula Bhashini v. A.P. Women's Coop. Finance Corpn. Ltd 73, the object of Article 243-W and the amendment by which it was introduced, has to be seen as an external aid to construction "for appreciating the true intent of the legislature or to find out the object sought to be achieved by enactment".
Patna High Court Cites 172 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

Binod Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 21 October, 2022

75. Therefore, as held in Excide Industries Ltd.72 and A. Patna High Court CWJC No.11717 of 2021 dt.21-10-2022 69/143 Manjula Bhashini v. A.P. Women's Coop. Finance Corpn. Ltd 73, the object of Article 243-W and the amendment by which it was introduced, has to be seen as an external aid to construction "for appreciating the true intent of the legislature or to find out the object sought to be achieved by enactment".
Patna High Court Cites 172 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

Bihar Local Bodies Employee Federation vs The State Of Bihar on 21 October, 2022

75. Therefore, as held in Excide Industries Ltd.72 and A. Patna High Court CWJC No.11717 of 2021 dt.21-10-2022 69/143 Manjula Bhashini v. A.P. Women's Coop. Finance Corpn. Ltd 73, the object of Article 243-W and the amendment by which it was introduced, has to be seen as an external aid to construction "for appreciating the true intent of the legislature or to find out the object sought to be achieved by enactment".
Patna High Court Cites 172 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

Pb Aided Colleges Retired Employees ... vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 12 February, 2015

The Division Bench in Beant Singh's case (supra) considered the judgment in Indian Aluminum Co.'s case (supra) followed in A. Manjula Bhashini Vs. Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Women's Co-operative Finance Corporation Limited AIR 2010 SC 3143. The Court held that the Legislature cannot directly overrule the decision or make a direction as not binding, but has power to make the decision ineffective by removing the base on which the decision was rendered in consonance with the law of the VIMAL KUMAR 2015.02.25 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh C.W.P.No.7398 of 2013 16 Constitution provided that the legislature must have competence to do the same. Considering the long title of the Act, the Court observed as under:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 1 - H Gupta - Full Document

Dr. Ashish Kumar Sinha vs The Union Of India on 21 October, 2022

75. Therefore, as held in Excide Industries Ltd.72 and A. Patna High Court CWJC No.11717 of 2021 dt.21-10-2022 69/143 Manjula Bhashini v. A.P. Women's Coop. Finance Corpn. Ltd 73, the object of Article 243-W and the amendment by which it was introduced, has to be seen as an external aid to construction "for appreciating the true intent of the legislature or to find out the object sought to be achieved by enactment".
Patna High Court Cites 172 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

Patna Nagar Nigam Staff Union vs The Union Of India on 21 October, 2022

75. Therefore, as held in Excide Industries Ltd.72 and A. Patna High Court CWJC No.11717 of 2021 dt.21-10-2022 69/143 Manjula Bhashini v. A.P. Women's Coop. Finance Corpn. Ltd 73, the object of Article 243-W and the amendment by which it was introduced, has to be seen as an external aid to construction "for appreciating the true intent of the legislature or to find out the object sought to be achieved by enactment".
Patna High Court Cites 172 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

Ramesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 21 October, 2022

75. Therefore, as held in Excide Industries Ltd.72 and A. Patna High Court CWJC No.11717 of 2021 dt.21-10-2022 69/143 Manjula Bhashini v. A.P. Women's Coop. Finance Corpn. Ltd 73, the object of Article 243-W and the amendment by which it was introduced, has to be seen as an external aid to construction "for appreciating the true intent of the legislature or to find out the object sought to be achieved by enactment".
Patna High Court Cites 172 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

Fairooz Fatima, Hyd. vs Prl. Secy., Higher Education And 4 Ors. on 31 October, 2025

17. Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in its order date 06.07.2009 in the case of A Manjula Bhashini Vs MD Women's Co-operative Finance Corporation Limited had upheld the validity of (AP. Regulation of Appointments to Public Services and rationalization of staff pattern and pay structure) Act-2/1994 as amended by Acts 3 and 27 of 1998 so also the cutoff date as fixed for continuance of their services subject to the required period of service as on 25.11 1993.
Telangana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

C.P.Krishnaswamy vs Union Of India on 10 December, 2009

48. The learned counsel for the respondent placed reliance upon the recent decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2009 IV LLJ 57 (SC) (Manjula Bhashini Vs. Managing Director, A.P.Women's Co-operative Finance Corporation Ltd.). The Hon'ble Supreme Court considered the case where the cut-off date was specified in the statute for determination of the eligibility of daily wage employees to be considered for regularisation and whether it was arbitrary, irregular and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. Prior to the Act which was known as Act 27 of 1998, by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, an ordinance came to be issued in 1993 and 1994 Act was enforced w.e.f. 25.11.1993, i.e., the date on which the ordinance was published in the official Gazette. The Hon'ble Supreme Court therefore held that the cut-off date fixed in the Act had direct bearing to the policy of regularisation which was issued by the State Government in exercise of its powers under Article 162 of the Constitution. The Hon'ble Supreme Court also held that by virtue of the policy which was enforced by 1994 Act, the Legislature could not have fixed any date other than 25.11.1993, for determining the eligibility of daily wage employees to fulfil the required five years continuous service. The Hon'ble Supreme Court went on to hold that if any other date has been fixed for gaining five years service of daily wage employees for the purpose of proviso to Section 7, the object sought to be achieved by enacting the 1994 Act would have been defeated, in as much as the regular recruitment could not have been made for appointment against the sanctioned post and back door entrant would have occupied the post. Having regard to such weighty reasons which weighed with the Hon'ble Supreme Court while accepting the cut-off date which reasons were specially applicable to the facts of that case. Therefore the said decision cannot have any application to the case on hand.
Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next