Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.98 seconds)

Kameshwar Sao & Anr vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 29 October, 2010

Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has also relied upon a Judgment of this Court, reported in 2007 (1) PLJR 692 (Rabindra Nath Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) .It has been submitted that a title dispute cannot be the subject matter of a proceeding under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that despite the fact that the petitioners had preferred a revision against the order of the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, the learned Sessions Judge only on technicality i.e. since the order was an interlocutory order, has rejected the revision petition.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R Kumar - Full Document

Kameshwar Sao &Amp; Anr vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 29 October, 2010

Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has also relied upon a Judgment of this Court, reported in 2007 (1) PLJR 692 (Rabindra Nath Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) .It has been submitted that a title dispute cannot be the subject matter of a proceeding under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that despite the fact that the petitioners had preferred a revision against the order of the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, the learned Sessions Judge only on technicality i.e. since the order was an interlocutory order, has rejected the revision petition.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R Kumar - Full Document

Dr.Rita Singh vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 15 November, 2010

This Court applying the ratio of Dr. Rabindra Nath Singh (supra) is constrained to hold that there is complete lack of materials showing application of mind by the authorities to the show-cause reply and/or explanation filed by the petitioner and as such the impugned cryptic order of punishment dated 12.11.2003 can not be sustained 4 and is accordingly quashed with a direction to the Principal Secretary of the Health Department to reconsider the matter afresh to pass a fresh reasoned order after perusing the two show cause replies filed by the petitioner dated 11.7.2003 and 1.9.2003 as contained in Annexure 10 and 12 to this writ application.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1